» Articles » PMID: 35655193

Frailty, Gaps in Care Coordination, and Preventable Adverse Events

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Jun 2
PMID 35655193
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Older US adults often receive care from multiple ambulatory providers. Seeing multiple providers may be clinically appropriate but creates challenges for communication. Whether frailty is a risk factor for gaps in communication among older adults and subsequent preventable adverse events is unknown.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling US adults ≥ 65 years of age in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who attended an in-home study examination in 2013-2016 and completed a survey on experiences with healthcare in 2017-2018 (n = 5,024). Using 5 frailty indicators (low body mass index, exhaustion, slow walk, weakness, and history of falls), we characterized participants into 3 mutually exclusive groups: not frail (0 indicators), intermediate-frail (1-2 indicators), and frail (3-5 indicators). We used survey data on self-reported gaps in care coordination and self-reported adverse events that participants attributed to poor communication among providers (a drug-drug interaction, repeat testing, an emergency department visit, or a hospital admission).

Results: Overall, 2,398 (47.7%) participants were not frail, 2,436 (48.5%) were intermediate-frail, and 190 (3.8%) were frail. The prevalence of any gap in care coordination was 37.0%, 40.8%, and 51.1% among participants who were not frail, intermediate-frail and frail, respectively. The adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) for any gap in care coordination among intermediate-frail and frail versus not frail participants was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.02-1.18) and 1.34 (95%CI 1.15-1.56), respectively. The prevalence of any preventable adverse event was 7.0%, 11.3% and 20.0% among participants who were not frail, intermediate-frail and frail, respectively. The adjusted PR for any preventable adverse event among those who were intermediate-frail and frail versus not frail was 1.47 (95%CI 1.22-1.77) and 2.24 (95%CI 1.60-3.14), respectively.

Conclusion: Among older adults, frailty is associated with an increased prevalence for self-reported gaps in care coordination and preventable adverse events. Targeted interventions to address patient-reported concerns regarding care coordination among intermediate-frail and frail older adults may be warranted.

Citing Articles

An Electronic Frailty Index Based on Deficit Accumulation May Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression.

Duy W, Pajewski N, Williamson J, Thompson A Clin Ophthalmol. 2025; 19:387-393.

PMID: 39931680 PMC: 11807780. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S503177.


Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Lindemann C, Burst V, Volker L, Brahler S, Simic D, Becker I Trials. 2024; 25(1):177.

PMID: 38468319 PMC: 10926660. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08026-8.


Primary and secondary care service use and costs associated with frailty in an ageing population: longitudinal analysis of an English primary care cohort of adults aged 50 and over, 2006-2017.

Fogg C, England T, Zhu S, Jones J, de Lusignan S, Fraser S Age Ageing. 2024; 53(2).

PMID: 38337044 PMC: 10857897. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae010.


Long-term recovery after critical illness in older adults.

Kaushik R, Ferrante L Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022; 28(5):572-580.

PMID: 35950731 PMC: 9458622. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000981.

References
1.
Espinoza S, Jung I, Hazuda H . Lower frailty incidence in older Mexican Americans than in older European Americans: the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58(11):2142-8. PMC: 3058917. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03153.x. View

2.
Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E . Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(3):199-200. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. View

3.
Rochat S, Cumming R, Blyth F, Creasey H, Handelsman D, Le Couteur D . Frailty and use of health and community services by community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(2):228-33. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp257. View

4.
Bandeen-Roche K, Seplaki C, Huang J, Buta B, Kalyani R, Varadhan R . Frailty in Older Adults: A Nationally Representative Profile in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 70(11):1427-34. PMC: 4723664. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv133. View

5.
McNallan S, Singh M, Chamberlain A, Kane R, Dunlay S, Redfield M . Frailty and healthcare utilization among patients with heart failure in the community. JACC Heart Fail. 2013; 1(2):135-41. PMC: 3743559. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.01.002. View