Challenges of Sperm Cryopreservation in Transferring Heat Adaptation of Corals Across Ocean Basins

Overview

Journal PeerJ

Specialties Biology
Environmental Health
General Medicine

Date 2022 Jun 2

PMID 35651741

Authors

Emily J Howells

Mary Hagedorn

Madeleine J H van Oppen

John A Burt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Reef-building corals live very close to their upper thermal limits and their persistence is imperiled by a rapidly warming climate. Human interventions may be used to increase the thermal limits of sensitive corals by cross-breeding with heat-adapted populations. However, the scope of breeding interventions is constrained by regional variation in the annual reproductive cycle of corals. Here we use cryopreservation technology to overcome this barrier and cross-breed conspecific coral populations across ocean basins for the first time. During regional spawning events, sperm samples were cryopreserved from populations of the widespread Indo-Pacific coral, , from the southern Persian Gulf (maximum daily sea surface temperature of 36 °C), the Oman Sea (33 °C), and the central Great Barrier Reef (30 °C). These sperm samples were thawed during a later spawning event to test their ability to fertilize freshly spawned eggs of colonies from the central Great Barrier Reef. Average fertilization success for the Persian Gulf (9%) and Oman Sea (6%) sperm were 1.4-2.5 times lower than those for the native cryopreserved sperm from Great Barrier Reef (13-15%), potentially due to lower sperm quality of the Middle Eastern sperm and/or reproductive incompatibility between these distant populations. Overall, fertilization success with cryopreserved sperm was low compared with fresh sperm (>80%), likely due to the low motility of thawed sperm (≤5%, reduced from 50% to >90% in fresh sperm). To evaluate whether cross-bred offspring had enhanced thermal tolerance, the survival of larvae sired by Persian Gulf cryopreserved sperm, Great Barrier Reef cryopreserved sperm, and Great Barrier Reef fresh sperm was monitored for six days at ambient (27 °C) and elevated (33 °C) temperature. Against expectations of thermal tolerance enhancement, survival of larvae sired by Persian Gulf cryopreserved sperm was 2.6 times lower than larvae sired by Great Barrier Reef fresh sperm at 33 °C (27% versus 71%), but did not differ at 27 °C (77% versus 84%). This lack of enhanced thermal tolerance was unlikely due to outbreeding depression as survival was equally poor in larvae sired by Great Barrier Reef cryopreserved sperm. Rather, follow-up tests showed that cryoprotectant exposure during fertilization (0.1% DMSO) has a negative effect on the survival of larvae which is exacerbated at elevated temperature. Collectively, our findings highlight challenges of breeding corals for enhanced thermal tolerance using cryopreserved sperm, which may be overcome by methodological advances in the collection and preservation of high-quality motile sperm and minimizing the exposure time of eggs to cryoprotectants.

References

Hughes T, Anderson K, Connolly S, Heron S, Kerry J, Lough J . Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science. 2018; 359(6371):80-83. DOI: 10.1126/science.aan8048. View

Matz M, Treml E, Aglyamova G, Bay L . Potential and limits for rapid genetic adaptation to warming in a Great Barrier Reef coral. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14(4):e1007220. PMC: 5908067. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007220. View

Matz M, Treml E, Haller B . Estimating the potential for coral adaptation to global warming across the Indo-West Pacific. Glob Chang Biol. 2020; 26(6):3473-3481. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15060. View

Zuchowicz N, Daly J, Lager C, Williamson O, Hagedorn M . Freezing on the beach: A robust coral sperm cryopreservation design. Cryobiology. 2021; 101:135-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.04.005. View

Quigley K, Bay L, van Oppen M . The active spread of adaptive variation for reef resilience. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(19):11122-11135. PMC: 6802068. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5616. View

Anthony K, Bay L, Costanza R, Firn J, Gunn J, Harrison P . New interventions are needed to save coral reefs. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 1(10):1420-1422. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0313-5. View

Palumbi S, Barshis D, Traylor-Knowles N, Bay R . Mechanisms of reef coral resistance to future climate change. Science. 2014; 344(6186):895-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251336. View

Howells E, Abrego D, Liew Y, Burt J, Meyer E, Aranda M . Enhancing the heat tolerance of reef-building corals to future warming. Sci Adv. 2021; 7(34). PMC: 8378819. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg6070. View

Hagedorn M, Carter V, Henley E, van Oppen M, Hobbs R, Spindler R . Producing Coral Offspring with Cryopreserved Sperm: A Tool for Coral Reef Restoration. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14432. PMC: 5663941. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14644-x. View

10.

Hagedorn M, Spindler R . The reality, use and potential for cryopreservation of coral reefs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 753:317-29. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2_13. View

11.

Howells E, Abrego D, Vaughan G, Burt J . Coral spawning in the Gulf of Oman and relationship to latitudinal variation in spawning season in the northwest Indian Ocean. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:7484. PMC: 4265778. DOI: 10.1038/srep07484. View

12.

Hagedorn M, van Oppen M, Carter V, Henley M, Abrego D, Puill-Stephan E . First frozen repository for the Great Barrier Reef coral created. Cryobiology. 2012; 65(2):157-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.05.008. View

13.

van Oppen M, Oliver J, Putnam H, Gates R . Building coral reef resilience through assisted evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(8):2307-13. PMC: 4345611. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422301112. View

14.

Fuller Z, Mocellin V, Morris L, Cantin N, Shepherd J, Sarre L . Population genetics of the coral : Toward genomic prediction of bleaching. Science. 2020; 369(6501). DOI: 10.1126/science.aba4674. View

15.

Howells E, Ketchum R, Bauman A, Mustafa Y, Watkins K, Burt J . Species-specific trends in the reproductive output of corals across environmental gradients and bleaching histories. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015; 105(2):532-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.034. View

16.

Hughes T, Kerry J, Baird A, Connolly S, Dietzel A, Eakin C . Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages. Nature. 2018; 556(7702):492-496. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0041-2. View

17.

Bruno J, Selig E, Casey K, Page C, Willis B, Harvell C . Thermal stress and coral cover as drivers of coral disease outbreaks. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(6):e124. PMC: 1865563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050124. View

18.

Hagedorn M, Carter V, Steyn R, Krupp D, Leong J, Lang R . Preliminary studies of sperm cryopreservation in the mushroom coral, Fungia scutaria. Cryobiology. 2006; 52(3):454-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2006.03.001. View

19.

Hagedorn M, Page C, ONeil K, Flores D, Tichy L, Conn T . Assisted gene flow using cryopreserved sperm in critically endangered coral. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(38). PMC: 8463791. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110559118. View

20.

Ohki S, Morita M, Kitanobo S, Kowalska A, Kowalski R . Cryopreservation of Acropora digitifera sperm with use of sucrose and methanol based solution. Cryobiology. 2014; 69(1):134-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2014.06.005. View