» Articles » PMID: 35650433

Communicating Doctors' Consensus Persistently Increases COVID-19 Vaccinations

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jun 1
PMID 35650433
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reluctance of people to get vaccinated represents a fundamental challenge to containing the spread of deadly infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Identifying misperceptions that can fuel vaccine hesitancy and creating effective communication strategies to overcome them are a global public health priority. Medical doctors are a trusted source of advice about vaccinations, but media reports may create an inaccurate impression that vaccine controversy is prevalent among doctors, even when a broad consensus exists. Here we show that public misperceptions about the views of doctors on the COVID-19 vaccines are widespread, and correcting them increases vaccine uptake. We implement a survey among 9,650 doctors in the Czech Republic and find that 90% of doctors trust the vaccines. Next, we show that 90% of respondents in a nationally representative sample (n = 2,101) underestimate doctors' trust; the most common belief is that only 50% of doctors trust the vaccines. Finally, we integrate randomized provision of information about the true views held by doctors into a longitudinal data collection that regularly monitors vaccination status over 9 months. The treatment recalibrates beliefs and leads to a persistent increase in vaccine uptake. The approach demonstrated in this paper shows how the engagement of professional medical associations, with their unparalleled capacity to elicit individual views of doctors on a large scale, can help to create a cheap, scalable intervention that has lasting positive impacts on health behaviour.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 vaccines as a game-changing tool? A corpus-based study of vaccine communication in People's Daily and The New York Times.

Wen Z, Liu M, Huan C Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e42082.

PMID: 39911436 PMC: 11795033. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42082.


Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

Vickers P, Adamo L, Alfano M, Clark C, Cresto E, Cui H PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313541.

PMID: 39642116 PMC: 11623554. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313541.


Using survey experiment pretesting to support future pandemic response.

Tappin B, Hewitt L PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(11):pgae469.

PMID: 39484044 PMC: 11523628. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae469.


Political polarization and health.

Van Bavel J, Gadarian S, Knowles E, Ruggeri K Nat Med. 2024; 30(11):3085-3093.

PMID: 39455731 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03307-w.


Lessons from COVID-19 for behavioural and communication interventions to enhance vaccine uptake.

Lewandowsky S, Schmid P, Habersaat K, Nielsen S, Seale H, Betsch C Commun Psychol. 2024; 1(1):35.

PMID: 39242715 PMC: 11332013. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00036-7.


References
1.
Milkman K, Gandhi L, Patel M, Graci H, Gromet D, Ho H . A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(6). PMC: 8833156. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115126119. View

2.
McDermott A . Core Concept: Herd immunity is an important-and often misunderstood-public health phenomenon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(21). PMC: 8166024. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107692118. View

3.
Jarrett C, Wilson R, OLeary M, Eckersberger E, Larson H . Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review. Vaccine. 2015; 33(34):4180-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040. View

4.
Bradley V, Kuriwaki S, Isakov M, Sejdinovic D, Meng X, Flaxman S . Unrepresentative big surveys significantly overestimated US vaccine uptake. Nature. 2021; 600(7890):695-700. PMC: 8653636. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04198-4. View

5.
Komenda M, Bulhart V, Karolyi M, Jarkovsky J, Muzik J, Majek O . Complex Reporting of the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Czech Republic: Use of an Interactive Web-Based App in Practice. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e19367. PMC: 7254961. DOI: 10.2196/19367. View