» Articles » PMID: 35647320

Cost-effectiveness of CT Perfusion for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (CLEOPATRA)-Study Protocol for a Healthcare Evaluation Study

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is variably considered to assess eligibility for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic (AIS) stroke patients. Although CTP is recommended for patient selection in later (6-24 h) time window, it is currently not recommended in the earlier (0-6 h) time window and the costs and health effects of including CTP for EVT selection remain unknown. We aim to estimate the costs and health effects of using CTP for EVT selection in AIS patients compared to conventional selection.

Patients And Methods: CLEOPATRA is a healthcare evaluation study using clinical and imaging data from multiple, prospective EVT trials and registries in both the earlier and later time windows. To study the long-term health and cost effects, we will construct a ("Markov") health state transition model simulating the clinical outcome over a 5-year follow-up period for CTP-based and conventional selection for EVT. Clinical data acquired within the current study and estimates from the literature will be used as input for probabilities of events, costs, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) per modified Rankin Scale (mRS) subscore. Primary outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) in terms of costs per QALY gained over the simulated follow-up period.

Study Outcomes: Outcome measures will be reported as cumulative values over a 5-year follow-up period.

Discussion: This study will provide preliminary insight into costs and health effects of including CTP in the selection for EVT for AIS patients, presenting between 0 and 24 h after time last known well. The results may be used to develop recommendations and inform further implementation projects and studies.

Citing Articles

Standardizing the estimation of ischemic regions can harmonize CT perfusion stroke imaging.

Peerlings D, Bennink E, Dankbaar J, Velthuis B, Emmer B, Hoving J Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(2):797-807.

PMID: 37572189 PMC: 10853359. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10035-1.


The costs associated with stroke care continuum: a systematic review.

Lucas-Noll J, Clua-Espuny J, Lleixa-Fortuno M, Gavalda-Espelta E, Queralt-Tomas L, Panisello-Tafalla A Health Econ Rev. 2023; 13(1):32.

PMID: 37193926 PMC: 10190015. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00439-6.

References
1.
Martins N, Aires A, Mendez B, Boned S, Rubiera M, Tomasello A . Ghost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Interv Neurol. 2018; 7(6):513-521. PMC: 6216773. DOI: 10.1159/000490117. View

2.
Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, Khatri P, Lobotesis K, Mazighi M . European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019; 11(6):535-538. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014568. View

3.
Treurniet K, LeCouffe N, Kappelhof M, Emmer B, van Es A, Boiten J . MR CLEAN-NO IV: intravenous treatment followed by endovascular treatment versus direct endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion-study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021; 22(1):141. PMC: 7885482. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05063-5. View

4.
Jansen I, Mulder M, Goldhoorn R . Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN Registry). BMJ. 2018; 360:k949. PMC: 5844245. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k949. View

5.
van den Berg L, Berkhemer O, Fransen P, Beumer D, Lingsma H, Majoie C . Economic Evaluation of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2021; 53(3):968-975. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034599. View