» Articles » PMID: 35645487

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Hypnosis, Acupressure and Audiovisual Aids in Reducing the Anxiety of Children During Administration of Local Anesthesia

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Jun 1
PMID 35645487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of acupressure, hypnosis and audiovisual aids in reducing anxiety in children during the administration of local anesthesia (LA).

Methodology: Two hundred apparently healthy children were selected randomly between 6 and 10 years of age and were divided into 4 groups with 50 children in each group. Group I: children were subjected to hypnosis, group II: acupressure, group III: AV aids i.e., VPT, and group IV: children were the control group where no anxiety-reducing techniques were used during administration of LA. The anxiety scores were recorded at three different time intervals by recording the pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (RR) and anxiety rate (AR) and subjected to statistical analysis.

Results: The results showed that, all the three distraction techniques showed a significant reduction in PR, RR and AR at all time intervals, when compared to the control group. A significant reduction in PR, RR and AR was seen in the hypnosis group when compared to acupressure and only PR in comparison to AV aids. There was no significant difference between group II and III in reducing anxiety.

Conclusion: The present study indicates that all the three distraction techniques were effective in reducing anxiety in children. Hypnosis was most promising, followed by audiovisual aids and acupressure.

Clinical Significance: The techniques can be utilized in a day-to-day practice to manage patients with anxiety.

How To Cite This Article: Erappa U, Konde S, Agarwal M, Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Hypnosis, Acupressure and Audiovisual Aids in Reducing the Anxiety of Children during Administration of Local Anesthesia. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(S-2):S186-S192.

Citing Articles

Hypnosis support in anaesthesia is rarely used in German anaesthesia departments - a nationwide survey among leading physicians of anaesthesia departments.

Bugers L, Wahner A, Schubert A, Dinges H, Torossian A, Volberg C BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):314.

PMID: 39242504 PMC: 11378643. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02705-4.


Anesthetic Effect of 2% Amitriptyline Versus 2% Lidocaine: A Comparative Evaluation.

Patel N, B Urolagin S, Haq M, Patel C, Bhatt R, Girdhar G Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43405.

PMID: 37581201 PMC: 10423460. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43405.


Clinical Hypnosis for Procedural Pain and Distress in Children: A Scoping Review.

Geagea D, Tyack Z, Kimble R, Polito V, Ayoub B, Terhune D Pain Med. 2022; 24(6):661-702.

PMID: 36448690 PMC: 10233484. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac186.

References
1.
Avisa P, Kamatham R, Vanjari K, Nuvvula S . Effectiveness of Acupressure on Dental Anxiety in Children. Pediatr Dent. 2018; 40(3):177-183. View

2.
Lambert S . The effects of hypnosis/guided imagery on the postoperative course of children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996; 17(5):307-10. DOI: 10.1097/00004703-199610000-00003. View

3.
Nuvvula S, Alahari S, Kamatham R, Challa R . Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014; 16(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0145-9. View

4.
Kaur R, Jindal R, Dua R, Mahajan S, Sethi K, Garg S . Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of audio and audiovisual distraction aids in the management of anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015; 33(3):192-203. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.160357. View

5.
Hofbauer R, Rainville P, Duncan G, Bushnell M . Cortical representation of the sensory dimension of pain. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(1):402-11. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.1.402. View