» Articles » PMID: 35644516

Perceived Timing of Cutaneous Vibration and Intracortical Microstimulation of Human Somatosensory Cortex

Overview
Journal Brain Stimul
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jun 1
PMID 35644516
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex can partially restore the sense of touch. Though ICMS bypasses much of the neuraxis, prior studies have found that conscious detection of touch elicited by ICMS lags behind the detection of cutaneous vibration. These findings may have been influenced by mismatched stimulus intensities, which can impact temporal perception.

Objective: Evaluate the relative latency at which intensity-matched vibration and ICMS are perceived by a human participant.

Methods: One person implanted with microelectrode arrays in somatosensory cortex performed reaction time and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. To measure reaction time, the participant reported when he perceived vibration or ICMS. In the TOJ task, vibration and ICMS were sequentially presented and the participant reported which stimulus occurred first. To verify that the participant could distinguish between stimuli, he also performed a modality discrimination task, in which he indicated if he felt vibration, ICMS, or both.

Results: When vibration was matched in perceived intensity to high-amplitude ICMS, vibration was perceived, on average, 48 ms faster than ICMS. However, in the TOJ task, both sensations arose at comparable latencies, with points of subjective simultaneity not significantly different from zero. The participant could discriminate between tactile modalities above chance level but was more inclined to report feeling vibration than ICMS.

Conclusions: The latencies of ICMS-evoked percepts are slower than their mechanical counterparts. However, differences in latencies are small, particularly when stimuli are matched for intensity, implying that ICMS-based somatosensory feedback is rapid enough to be effective in neuroprosthetic applications.

Citing Articles

Wrist posture unpredictably affects perception of targeted transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with wrist-placed electrodes.

Thomas N, Osborn L, Moran C, Fifer M, Christie B Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1490828.

PMID: 39720232 PMC: 11667115. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1490828.


Visual context affects the perceived timing of tactile sensations elicited through intra-cortical microstimulation.

Rosenthal I, Bashford L, Bjanes D, Pejsa K, Lee B, Liu C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38798438 PMC: 11118490. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.13.593529.


Sensory integration for neuroprostheses: from functional benefits to neural correlates.

Ding K, Rakhshan M, Paredes-Acuna N, Cheng G, Thakor N Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62(10):2939-2960.

PMID: 38760597 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03118-8.


Utilization of peripheral nerve feedback at a preconscious level.

Chowdhury N, Tyler D Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1336431.

PMID: 38550562 PMC: 10977079. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1336431.


Behavioral paradigm for the evaluation of stimulation-evoked somatosensory perception thresholds in rats.

Smith T, Wu Y, Cheon C, Khan A, Srinivasan H, Capadona J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1202258.

PMID: 37383105 PMC: 10293669. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1202258.