3R Measures in Facilities for the Production of Genetically Modified Rodents

Overview

Journal Lab Anim (NY)

Date 2022 May 31

PMID 35641635

Authors

Branko Zevnik

Boris Jerchow

Thorsten Buch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Sociocultural changes in the human-animal relationship have led to increasing demands for animal welfare in biomedical research. The 3R concept is the basis for bringing this demand into practice: Replace animal experiments with alternatives where possible, Reduce the number of animals used to a scientifically justified minimum and Refine the procedure to minimize animal harm. The generation of gene-modified sentient animals such as mice and rats involves many steps that include various forms of manipulation. So far, no coherent analysis of the application of the 3Rs to gene manipulation has been performed. Here we provide guidelines from the Committee on Genetics and Breeding of Laboratory Animals of the German Society for Laboratory Animal Science to implement the 3Rs in every step during the generation of genetically modified animals. We provide recommendations for applying the 3Rs as well as success/intervention parameters for each step of the process, from experiment planning to choice of technology, harm-benefit analysis, husbandry conditions, management of genetically modified lines and actual procedures. We also discuss future challenges for animal welfare in the context of developing technologies. Taken together, we expect that our comprehensive analysis and our recommendations for the appropriate implementation of the 3Rs to technologies for genetic modifications of rodents will benefit scientists from a wide range of disciplines and will help to improve the welfare of a large number of laboratory animals worldwide.

Citing Articles

pTau pathology in the retina of TAU58 mice: association with ganglion cell degeneration and implications on seeding and propagation of pTau from human brain lysates.

Walkiewicz G, Ronisz A, Ospitalieri S, Tsaka G, Tome S, Vandenberghe R Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2024; 12(1):194.

PMID: 39707519 PMC: 11662635. DOI: 10.1186/s40478-024-01907-8.

Naturally sterile Mus spretus hybrids are suitable for the generation of pseudopregnant embryo transfer recipients.

Preece C, Biggs D, Grencis E, Jackson M, Allen S, Fray M Lab Anim (NY). 2024; 53(7):181-185.

PMID: 38886565 PMC: 11216974. DOI: 10.1038/s41684-024-01393-4.

Currently Used Methods to Evaluate the Efficacy of Therapeutic Drugs and Kidney Safety.

Huang H, Chou C, Sandar T, Liu W, Yang H, Lin Y Biomolecules. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002263 PMC: 10669823. DOI: 10.3390/biom13111581.

From bugs to bedside: functional annotation of human genetic variation for neurological disorders using invertebrate models.

Mew M, Caldwell K, Caldwell G Hum Mol Genet. 2022; 31(R1):R37-R46.

PMID: 35994032 PMC: 9585664. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddac203.

References

Kaneko T, Sakuma T, Yamamoto T, Mashimo T . Simple knockout by electroporation of engineered endonucleases into intact rat embryos. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:6382. PMC: 4180828. DOI: 10.1038/srep06382. View

Hashimoto M, Takemoto T . Electroporation enables the efficient mRNA delivery into the mouse zygotes and facilitates CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:11315. PMC: 4463957. DOI: 10.1038/srep11315. View

Chen S, Lee B, Lee A, Modzelewski A, He L . Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes. J Biol Chem. 2016; 291(28):14457-67. PMC: 4938170. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733154. View

Wang W, Kutny P, Byers S, Longstaff C, DaCosta M, Pang C . Delivery of Cas9 Protein into Mouse Zygotes through a Series of Electroporation Dramatically Increases the Efficiency of Model Creation. J Genet Genomics. 2016; 43(5):319-27. PMC: 4892940. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.02.004. View

Troder S, Ebert L, Butt L, Assenmacher S, Schermer B, Zevnik B . An optimized electroporation approach for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in murine zygotes. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0196891. PMC: 5933690. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196891. View

Takahashi G, Gurumurthy C, Wada K, Miura H, Sato M, Ohtsuka M . GONAD: Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery system: a novel microinjection independent genome engineering method in mice. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:11406. PMC: 4476150. DOI: 10.1038/srep11406. View

Gordon J, Scangos G, Plotkin D, Barbosa J, Ruddle F . Genetic transformation of mouse embryos by microinjection of purified DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77(12):7380-4. PMC: 350507. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7380. View

Brinster R, Chen H, Trumbauer M, Senear A, Warren R, Palmiter R . Somatic expression of herpes thymidine kinase in mice following injection of a fusion gene into eggs. Cell. 1981; 27(1 Pt 2):223-31. PMC: 4883678. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90376-7. View

Costantini F, Lacy E . Introduction of a rabbit beta-globin gene into the mouse germ line. Nature. 1981; 294(5836):92-4. DOI: 10.1038/294092a0. View

10.

Lindner L, Cayrou P, Rosahl T, Zhou H, Birling M, Herault Y . Droplet digital PCR or quantitative PCR for in-depth genomic and functional validation of genetically altered rodents. Methods. 2021; 191:107-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.001. View

11.

Henikoff S . Conspiracy of silence among repeated transgenes. Bioessays. 1998; 20(7):532-5. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199807)20:7<532::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-M. View

12.

Goodwin L, Splinter E, Davis T, Urban R, He H, Braun R . Large-scale discovery of mouse transgenic integration sites reveals frequent structural variation and insertional mutagenesis. Genome Res. 2019; 29(3):494-505. PMC: 6396414. DOI: 10.1101/gr.233866.117. View

13.

Chiang C, Jacobsen J, Ernst C, Hanscom C, Heilbut A, Blumenthal I . Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(4):390-7, S1. PMC: 3340016. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2202. View

14.

Cain-Hom C, Splinter E, van Min M, Simonis M, van de Heijning M, Martinez M . Efficient mapping of transgene integration sites and local structural changes in Cre transgenic mice using targeted locus amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(8):e62. PMC: 5416772. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1329. View

15.

Mukai H, Motohashi H, Ohneda O, Suzuki N, Nagano M, Yamamoto M . Transgene insertion in proximity to the c-myb gene disrupts erythroid-megakaryocytic lineage bifurcation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 26(21):7953-65. PMC: 1636724. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00718-06. View

16.

Durkin M, Popescu N, Thorgeirsson S . Integration of a c-myc transgene results in disruption of the mouse Gtf2ird1 gene, the homologue of the human GTF2IRD1 gene hemizygously deleted in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Genomics. 2001; 73(1):20-7. DOI: 10.1006/geno.2001.6507. View

17.

de Vree P, de Wit E, Yilmaz M, van de Heijning M, Klous P, Verstegen M . Targeted sequencing by proximity ligation for comprehensive variant detection and local haplotyping. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(10):1019-25. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2959. View

18.

Blondal T, Gamba C, Jagd L, Su L, Demirov D, Guo S . Verification of CRISPR editing and finding transgenic inserts by Xdrop indirect sequence capture followed by short- and long-read sequencing. Methods. 2021; 191:68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.02.003. View

19.

Remy S, Nguyen T, Menoret S, Tesson L, Usal C, Anegon I . The use of lentiviral vectors to obtain transgenic rats. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 597:109-25. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-389-3_8. View

20.

Giraldo P, Montoliu L . Size matters: use of YACs, BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res. 2001; 10(2):83-103. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008918913249. View