» Articles » PMID: 35639557

Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training

Overview
Journal Schizophr Bull
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 May 31
PMID 35639557
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Hypothesis: In a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but few studies have examined the computational mechanisms underlying this and related belief-updating biases. Here, we employ a computational approach to understand the relationship between jumping-to-conclusions, psychotic disorders, and delusions.

Study Design: We modeled probabilistic reasoning of 261 patients with psychotic disorders and 56 healthy controls during an information sampling task-the fish task-with the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter. Subsequently, we examined the clinical utility of this computational approach by testing whether computational parameters, obtained from fitting the model to each individual's behavior, could predict treatment response to Metacognitive Training using machine learning.

Study Results: We observed differences in probabilistic reasoning between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, participants with and without jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not between patients with low and high current delusions. The computational analysis suggested that belief instability was increased in patients with psychotic disorders. Jumping-to-conclusions was associated with both increased belief instability and greater prior uncertainty. Lastly, belief instability predicted treatment response to Metacognitive Training at the individual level.

Conclusions: Our results point towards increased belief instability as a key computational mechanism underlying probabilistic reasoning in psychotic disorders. We provide a proof-of-concept that this computational approach may be useful to help identify suitable treatments for individual patients with psychotic disorders.

Citing Articles

Psychotic-Like Reasoning Styles in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder? An Experimental Investigation of the Jumping to Conclusions Bias.

Scheunemann J, Schilling L, Andreou C, Moritz S Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025; 32(2):e70051.

PMID: 40042157 PMC: 11881219. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.70051.


Altered Perception of Environmental Volatility During Social Learning in Emerging Psychosis.

Hauke D, Wobmann M, Andreou C, Mackintosh A, de Bock R, Karvelis P Comput Psychiatr. 2024; 8(1):1-22.

PMID: 38774429 PMC: 11104374. DOI: 10.5334/cpsy.95.


Toxoplasma gondii infection associated with inflammasome activation and neuronal injury.

Andreou D, Steen N, Morch-Johnsen L, Jorgensen K, Wortinger L, Barth C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5327.

PMID: 38438515 PMC: 10912117. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55887-9.


Blocking D2/D3 dopamine receptors in male participants increases volatility of beliefs when learning to trust others.

Mikus N, Eisenegger C, Mathys C, Clark L, Muller U, Robbins T Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):4049.

PMID: 37422466 PMC: 10329681. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39823-5.


Interactions between the cortical midline structures and sensorimotor network track maladaptive self-beliefs in clinical high risk for psychosis.

Cowan H, Damme K, Mittal V Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022; 8(1):74.

PMID: 36114173 PMC: 9481626. DOI: 10.1038/s41537-022-00279-z.

References
1.
Moritz S, Veckenstedt R, Bohn F, Hottenrott B, Scheu F, Randjbar S . Complementary group Metacognitive Training (MCT) reduces delusional ideation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013; 151(1-3):61-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.10.007. View

2.
Huq S, Garety P, Hemsley D . Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988; 40(4):801-12. DOI: 10.1080/14640748808402300. View

3.
Ross R, McKay R, Coltheart M, Langdon R . Jumping to Conclusions About the Beads Task? A Meta-analysis of Delusional Ideation and Data-Gathering. Schizophr Bull. 2015; 41(5):1183-91. PMC: 4535629. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu187. View

4.
Jardri R, Deneve S . Circular inferences in schizophrenia. Brain. 2013; 136(Pt 11):3227-41. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt257. View

5.
Daunizeau J, den Ouden H, Pessiglione M, Kiebel S, Friston K, Stephan K . Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15555. PMC: 3001882. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015555. View