» Articles » PMID: 35635840

Nursing Workflow Change in a COVID-19 Inpatient Unit Following the Deployment of Inpatient Telehealth: Observational Study Using a Real-Time Locating System

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 May 31
PMID 35635840
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread implementation of telehealth, including in the inpatient setting, with the goals to reduce potential pathogen exposure events and personal protective equipment (PPE) utilization. Nursing workflow adaptations in these novel environments are of particular interest given the association between nursing time at the bedside and patient safety. Understanding the frequency and duration of nurse-patient encounters following the introduction of a novel telehealth platform in the context of COVID-19 may therefore provide insight into downstream impacts on patient safety, pathogen exposure, and PPE utilization.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in nursing workflow relative to prepandemic levels using a real-time locating system (RTLS) following the deployment of inpatient telehealth on a COVID-19 unit.

Methods: In March 2020, telehealth was installed in patient rooms in a COVID-19 unit and on movable carts in 3 comparison units. The existing RTLS captured nurse movement during 1 pre- and 5 postpandemic stages (January-December 2020). Change in direct nurse-patient encounters, time spent in patient rooms per encounter, and total time spent with patients per shift relative to baseline were calculated. Generalized linear models assessed difference-in-differences in outcomes between COVID-19 and comparison units. Telehealth adoption was captured and reported at the unit level.

Results: Change in frequency of encounters and time spent per encounter from baseline differed between the COVID-19 and comparison units at all stages of the pandemic (all P<.001). Frequency of encounters decreased (difference-in-differences range -6.6 to -14.1 encounters) and duration of encounters increased (difference-in-differences range 1.8 to 6.2 minutes) from baseline to a greater extent in the COVID-19 units relative to the comparison units. At most stages of the pandemic, the change in total time nurses spent in patient rooms per patient per shift from baseline did not differ between the COVID-19 and comparison units (all P>.17). The primary COVID-19 unit quickly adopted telehealth technology during the observation period, initiating 15,088 encounters that averaged 6.6 minutes (SD 13.6) each.

Conclusions: RTLS movement data suggest that total nursing time at the bedside remained unchanged following the deployment of inpatient telehealth in a COVID-19 unit. Compared to other units with shared mobile telehealth units, the frequency of nurse-patient in-person encounters decreased and the duration lengthened on a COVID-19 unit with in-room telehealth availability, indicating "batched" redistribution of work to maintain total time at bedside relative to prepandemic periods. The simultaneous adoption of telehealth suggests that virtual care was a complement to, rather than a replacement for, in-person care. However, study limitations preclude our ability to draw a causal link between nursing workflow change and telehealth adoption. Thus, further evaluation is needed to determine potential downstream implications on disease transmission, PPE utilization, and patient safety.

Citing Articles

Sleep Quality and Poor Sleep-related Factors Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam.

Phan T, Nguyen H, Dang C, Phan M, Nguyen V, Le V J Prev Med Public Health. 2023; 56(4):319-326.

PMID: 37551070 PMC: 10415641. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.22.528.


Evaluating clinician-led quality improvement initiatives: A system-wide embedded research partnership at Stanford Medicine.

Vilendrer S, Saliba-Gustafsson E, Asch S, Brown-Johnson C, Kling S, Shaw J Learn Health Syst. 2022; 6(4):e10335.

PMID: 36263267 PMC: 9576232. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10335.

References
1.
Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M . Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(1):4-12. PMC: 5768250. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16674087. View

2.
Halabi R, Smith G, Sylwestrzak M, Clay B, Longhurst C, Lander L . The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(5):e28845. PMC: 8136403. DOI: 10.2196/28845. View

3.
Jones T . Radiofrequency identification: exploiting an old technology for measuring nurse time and motion. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012; 30(9):463-72. PMC: 5520798. DOI: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182545418. View

4.
Patel B, Vilendrer S, Kling S, Brown I, Ribeira R, Eisenberg M . Using a Real-Time Locating System to Evaluate the Impact of Telemedicine in an Emergency Department During COVID-19: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(7):e29240. PMC: 8315159. DOI: 10.2196/29240. View

5.
Fahey L, Lopez K, Storfjell J, Keenan G . Expanding potential of radiofrequency nurse call systems to measure nursing time in patient rooms. J Nurs Adm. 2013; 43(5):302-7. DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31828eebe1. View