» Articles » PMID: 35632747

Belatacept As a Treatment Option in Patients with Severe BK Polyomavirus Infection and High Immunological Risk-Walking a Tightrope Between Viral Control and Prevention of Rejection

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35632747
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Balancing the immune system with immunosuppressive treatment is essential in kidney transplant recipients to avoid allograft rejection on the one hand and infectious complications on the other. BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a viral complication that seriously threatens kidney allograft survival. Therefore, the main treatment strategy is to reduce immunosuppression, but this is associated with an increased rejection risk. Belatacept is an immunosuppressant that acts by blocking the CD80/86-CD28 co-stimulatory pathway of effector T-cells with marked effects on the humoral response. However, when compared with calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI), the cellular rejection rate is higher. With this in mind, we hypothesized that belatacept could be used as rescue therapy in severely BKPyV-affected patients with high immunological risk. We present three cases of patients with BKPyVAN-associated complications and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and one patient who developed T-cell-mediated rejection after a reduction in immunosuppression in response to BKPyVAN. Patients were switched to a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen and showed significantly improved viral control and stabilized graft function. The cases presented here suggest that belatacept is a potential treatment option in the complicated situation of refractory BKPyV infection in patients with high immunological risk.

Citing Articles

Special Issue "New Frontiers in Small DNA Virus Research".

Strati K, Pyeon D Viruses. 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36680299 PMC: 9865906. DOI: 10.3390/v15010259.

References
1.
Noble J, Jouve T, Janbon B, Rostaing L, Malvezzi P . Belatacept in kidney transplantation and its limitations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019; 15(4):359-367. DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1574570. View

2.
Durrbach A, Pestana J, Pearson T, Vincenti F, Garcia V, Campistol J . A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study). Am J Transplant. 2010; 10(3):547-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03016.x. View

3.
Budde K, Prashar R, Haller H, Rial M, Kamar N, Agarwal A . Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase 3b Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32(12):3252-3264. PMC: 8638403. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021050628. View

4.
Egli A, Infanti L, Dumoulin A, Buser A, Samaridis J, Stebler C . Prevalence of polyomavirus BK and JC infection and replication in 400 healthy blood donors. J Infect Dis. 2009; 199(6):837-46. DOI: 10.1086/597126. View

5.
Bray R, Gebel H, Townsend R, Roberts M, Polinsky M, Yang L . De novo donor-specific antibodies in belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated kidney-transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18(7):1783-1789. PMC: 6055714. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14721. View