» Articles » PMID: 35629024

Individual-Level and Neighborhood-Level Factors Associated with Longitudinal Changes in Cardiometabolic Measures in Participants of a Clinic-Based Care Coordination Program: A Secondary Data Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35629024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying individual and neighborhood-level factors associated with worsening cardiometabolic risks despite clinic-based care coordination may help identify candidates for supplementary team-based care. Methods: Secondary data analysis of data from a two-year nurse-led care coordination program cohort of Medicare, Medicaid, dual-eligible adults, Leveraging Information Technology to Guide High Tech, High Touch Care (LIGHT2), from ten Midwestern primary care clinics in the U.S. Outcome Measures: Hemoglobin A1C, low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and blood pressure. Multivariable generalized linear regression models assessed individual and neighborhood-level factors associated with changes in outcome measures from before to after completion of the LIGHT2 program. Results: 6378 participants had pre-and post-intervention levels reported for at least one outcome measure. In adjusted models, higher pre-intervention cardiometabolic measures were associated with worsening of all cardiometabolic measures. Women had worsening LDL-cholesterol compared with men. Women with pre-intervention HbA1c > 6.8% and systolic blood pressure > 131 mm of Hg had worse post-intervention HbA1c and systolic blood pressure compared with men. Adding individual’s neighborhood-level risks did not change effect sizes significantly. Conclusions: Increased cardiometabolic risks and gender were associated with worsening cardiometabolic outcomes. Understanding unresolved gender-specific needs and preferences of patients with increased cardiometabolic risks may aid in tailoring clinic-community-linked care planning.

Citing Articles

Self-Monitoring With Coping Skills and Lifestyle Education for Hypertension Control in Primary Care.

Patil S, Guo N, Udoh E, Todorov I J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 26(12):1487-1501.

PMID: 39437225 PMC: 11654848. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14921.

References
1.
Popejoy L, Jaddoo J, Sherman J, Howk C, Nguyen R, Parker J . Monitoring Resource Utilization in a Health Care Coordination Program. Prof Case Manag. 2015; 20(6):310-20. DOI: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000120. View

2.
Sequist T, Taveras E . Clinic-community linkages for high-value care. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2148-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1408457. View

3.
Proia K, Thota A, Njie G, Finnie R, Hopkins D, Mukhtar Q . Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47(1):86-99. PMC: 4672378. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004. View

4.
Shen X, DiMario S, Philip K . Gender Disparities in Health Resource Utilization in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Adv Ther. 2019; 36(12):3424-3434. PMC: 6860468. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01107-0. View

5.
Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Sholle E, Abedian S, Sharko M, Reading Turchioe M . Assessing the impact of social determinants of health on predictive models for potentially avoidable 30-day readmission or death. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0235064. PMC: 7316307. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235064. View