» Articles » PMID: 35628318

Tie-Over Bolster Pressure Dressing Improves Outcomes of Skin Substitutes Xenografts on Athymic Mice

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35628318
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficacy of skin substitutes is established for the treatment of burn injuries, but its use is not limited to this condition. This technology has the potential to improve the treatment of various conditions by offering highly advanced and personalized treatments. In vivo studies are challenging but essential to move to clinical use in humans. Mice are the most widely used species in preclinical studies, but the main drawback of this model is the limited surface area of the graft in long-term transplantation studies caused by the displacement and the contraction of the graft. We improved the conventional surgical procedures by stabilizing the chamber covering the graft with intramuscular sutures and by adding a tie-over bolster dressing. The current study was therefore performed to compare outcomes of skin grafts between the conventional and optimized skin graft model. Human self-assembled skin substitutes (SASSs) were prepared and grafted to athymic mice either by the conventional method or by the new grafting method. Graft healing and complications were assessed using digital photographs on postoperative days 7, 14, and 21. Similar structure and organization were observed by histological staining. The new grafting method reduced medium and large displacement events by 1.26-fold and medium and large contraction events by 1.8-fold, leading to a 1.6-fold increase in graft surface area compared to skin substitutes grafted with the usual method. This innovation ensures better reproducibility and consistency of skin substitute transplants on mice.

Citing Articles

Cancer Spheroids Embedded in Tissue-Engineered Skin Substitutes: A New Method to Study Tumorigenicity In Vivo.

Barbier M, Ferland K, De Koninck H, Doucet E, Dubourget L, Kim M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(3).

PMID: 38338792 PMC: 10855415. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031513.


Production of Tissue-Engineered Skin Substitutes for Clinical Applications: Elimination of Serum.

Doucet E, Ghio S, Barbier M, Savard E, Magne B, Safoine M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37628718 PMC: 10454817. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612537.

References
1.
Wang Y, Mithieux S, Kong Y, Wang X, Chong C, Fathi A . Tropoelastin incorporation into a dermal regeneration template promotes wound angiogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014; 4(4):577-84. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201400571. View

2.
Matouskova E, Mestak O . The effect of different biologic and biosynthetic wound covers on keratinocyte growth, stratification and differentiation in vitro. J Tissue Eng. 2014; 5:2041731414554966. PMC: 4221924. DOI: 10.1177/2041731414554966. View

3.
Huging M, Biedermann T, Sobrio M, Meyer S, Bottcher-Haberzeth S, Manuel E . The Effect of Wound Dressings on a Bio-Engineered Human Dermo-Epidermal Skin Substitute in a Rat Model. J Burn Care Res. 2017; 38(6):354-364. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000530. View

4.
Xu W, Germain L, Goulet F, Auger F . Permanent grafting of living skin substitutes: surgical parameters to control for successful results. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996; 17(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199601000-00005. View

5.
Fusenig N, Breitkreutz D, Dzarlieva R, Boukamp P, Bohnert A, Tilgen W . Growth and differentiation characteristics of transformed keratinocytes from mouse and human skin in vitro and in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 1983; 81(1 Suppl):168s-75s. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12541032. View