» Articles » PMID: 35628303

An Integrated Approach Reveals DNA Damage and Proteotoxic Stress As Main Effects of Proton Radiation in

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35628303
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proton radiotherapy (PRT) has the potential to reduce the normal tissue toxicity associated with conventional photon-based radiotherapy (X-ray therapy, XRT) because the active dose can be more directly targeted to a tumor. Although this dosimetric advantage of PRT is well known, the molecular mechanisms affected by PRT remain largely elusive. Here, we combined the molecular toolbox of the eukaryotic model Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a systems biology approach to investigate the physiological effects of PRT compared to XRT. Our data show that the DNA damage response and protein stress response are the major molecular mechanisms activated after both PRT and XRT. However, RNA-Seq revealed that PRT treatment evoked a stronger activation of genes involved in the response to proteotoxic stress, highlighting the molecular differences between PRT and XRT. Moreover, inhibition of the proteasome resulted in decreased survival in combination with PRT compared to XRT, not only further confirming that protons induced a stronger proteotoxic stress response, but also hinting at the potential of using proteasome inhibitors in combination with proton radiotherapy in clinical settings.

Citing Articles

Radiobiology of Proton Therapy in Human Papillomavirus-Negative and Human Papillomavirus-Positive Head and Neck Cancer Cells.

Dok R, Vanderwaeren L, Verstrepen K, Nuyts S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38893080 PMC: 11171379. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111959.


Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Ionizing Radiation in and Its Relationship with Aging, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidant Activity.

Gonzalez-Vidal A, Mercado-Saenz S, Burgos-Molina A, Alamilla-Presuel J, Alcaraz M, Sendra-Portero F Antioxidants (Basel). 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37759994 PMC: 10525530. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12091690.


as a Model System for Eukaryotic Cell Biology, from Cell Cycle Control to DNA Damage Response.

Vanderwaeren L, Dok R, Voordeckers K, Nuyts S, Verstrepen K Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19).

PMID: 36232965 PMC: 9570374. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911665.

References
1.
De Ruysscher D, Niedermann G, Burnet N, Siva S, Lee A, Hegi-Johnson F . Radiotherapy toxicity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5(1):13. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0064-5. View

2.
Youker R, Walsh P, Beilharz T, Lithgow T, Brodsky J . Distinct roles for the Hsp40 and Hsp90 molecular chaperones during cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator degradation in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2004; 15(11):4787-97. PMC: 524727. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-07-0584. View

3.
Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen U . Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(15):8276-82. PMC: 37432. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.121006298. View

4.
Botstein D, Chervitz S, Cherry J . Yeast as a model organism. Science. 1997; 277(5330):1259-60. PMC: 3039837. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1259. View

5.
Szymonowicz K, Krysztofiak A, Linden J, Kern A, Deycmar S, Oeck S . Proton Irradiation Increases the Necessity for Homologous Recombination Repair Along with the Indispensability of Non-Homologous End Joining. Cells. 2020; 9(4). PMC: 7226794. DOI: 10.3390/cells9040889. View