» Articles » PMID: 35625314

C/MIC > 4: A Potential Instrument to Predict the Efficacy of Meropenem

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35625314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective study aimed to explore the determinants of meropenem trough concentration (Ctrough) in patients with bacterial pneumonia and to investigate the association between its concentration and efficacy. From January 2019 to December 2019, patients with pulmonary infections were prospectively enrolled from the intensive care unit. Factors affecting the meropenem trough concentration were analyzed, and a multiple linear regression model was constructed. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between Ctrough and clinical efficacy. A total of 64 patients were enrolled, in whom 210 meropenem concentrations were measured. Of the total, 60.9% (39/64) were considered clinically successful after treatment. Ctrough may increase with increased blood urea nitrogen, albumin, and concomitant antifungal use. By contrast, concentration may decrease with increased endogenous creatinine clearance rate. Six variables, including Ctrough/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) > 4, were associated with the efficacy of meropenem. There was an independent correlation between Ctrough/MIC > 4 and efficacy after fully adjusting for confounding factors. Based upon renal function indexes, it is possible to predict changes in meropenem concentration and adjust the dosage precisely and individually. Ctrough/MIC > 4 is a potential instrument to predict successful treatment with meropenem.

References
1.
Nunes M, Filho A, Alvares V, Meneguz-Moreno R, Lamas E, Loures V . CKD-EPI versus Cockcroft-Gault formula for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients without significant renal impairment. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018; 37(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.05.009. View

2.
Burger R, Guidi M, Calpini V, Lamoth F, Decosterd L, Robatel C . Effect of renal clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy on appropriateness of recommended meropenem dosing regimens in critically ill patients with susceptible life-threatening infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73(12):3413-3422. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky370. View

3.
Tam V, McKinnon P, Akins R, Rybak M, Drusano G . Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002; 50(3):425-8. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf130. View

4.
Nguyen C, Do T, Bruggemann R, Ten Oever J, Kolwijck E, Adang E . Clinical cure rate and cost-effectiveness of carbapenem-sparing beta-lactams vs. meropenem for Gram-negative infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019; 54(6):790-797. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.07.003. View

5.
Chen C, Yan M, Hu C, Lv X, Zhang H, Chen S . Diagnostic efficacy of serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein concentration and clinical pulmonary infection score in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Med Sci (Paris). 2018; 34 Focus issue F1:26-32. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/201834f105. View