» Articles » PMID: 35625039

NMDA Enhances and Glutamate Attenuates Synchrony of Spontaneous Phase-Locked Locus Coeruleus Network Rhythm in Newborn Rat Brain Slices

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 28
PMID 35625039
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Locus coeruleus (LC) neurons are controlled by glutamatergic inputs. Here, we studied in brain slices of neonatal rats NMDA and glutamate effects on phase-locked LC neuron spiking at ~1 Hz summating to ~0.2 s-lasting bell-shaped local field potential (LFP). NMDA: 10 μM accelerated LFP 1.7-fold, whereas 25 and 50 μM, respectively, increased its rate 3.2- and 4.6-fold while merging discrete events into 43 and 56% shorter oscillations. After 4-6 min, LFP oscillations stopped every 6 s for 1 s, resulting in 'oscillation trains'. A dose of 32 μM depolarized neurons by 8.4 mV to cause 7.2-fold accelerated spiking at reduced jitter and enhanced synchrony with the LFP, as evident from cross-correlation. Glutamate: 25-50 μM made rhythm more irregular and the LFP pattern could transform into 2.7-fold longer-lasting multipeak discharge. In 100 μM, LFP amplitude and duration declined. In 25-50 μM, neurons depolarized by 5 mV to cause 3.7-fold acceleration of spiking that was less synchronized with LFP. Both agents: evoked 'post-agonist depression' of LFP that correlated with the amplitude and kinetics of V hyperpolarization. The findings show that accelerated spiking during NMDA and glutamate is associated with enhanced or attenuated LC synchrony, respectively, causing distinct LFP pattern transformations. Shaping of LC population discharge dynamics by ionotropic glutamate receptors potentially fine-tunes its influence on brain functions.

Citing Articles

Mediation of Sinusoidal Network Oscillations in the Locus Coeruleus of Newborn Rat Slices by Pharmacologically Distinct AMPA and KA Receptors.

Rawal B, Ballanyi K Brain Sci. 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35884751 PMC: 9321180. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070945.


Autocrine Neuromodulation and Network Activity Patterns in the Locus Coeruleus of Newborn Rat Slices.

Waselenchuk Q, Ballanyi K Brain Sci. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35447969 PMC: 9024645. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040437.

References
1.
Jin X, Li S, Bondy B, Zhong W, Oginsky M, Wu Y . Identification of a Group of GABAergic Neurons in the Dorsomedial Area of the Locus Coeruleus. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146470. PMC: 4718449. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146470. View

2.
Aston-Jones G, Ennis M, Pieribone V, Nickell W, Shipley M . The brain nucleus locus coeruleus: restricted afferent control of a broad efferent network. Science. 1986; 234(4777):734-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.3775363. View

3.
Aghajanian G, VanderMaelen C, Andrade R . Intracellular studies on the role of calcium in regulating the activity and reactivity of locus coeruleus neurons in vivo. Brain Res. 1983; 273(2):237-43. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90848-x. View

4.
Safaai H, Neves R, Eschenko O, Logothetis N, Panzeri S . Modeling the effect of locus coeruleus firing on cortical state dynamics and single-trial sensory processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(41):12834-9. PMC: 4611622. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516539112. View

5.
Zhu Z, Munhall A, Shen K, Johnson S . Calcium-dependent subthreshold oscillations determine bursting activity induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate in rat subthalamic neurons in vitro. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19(5):1296-304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03240.x. View