Co-fertilization of Sulfur and Struvite-Phosphorus in a Slow-Release Fertilizer Improves Soybean Cultivation

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2022 May 27

PMID 35620702

Authors

Stella F Valle

Amanda S Giroto

Gelton G F Guimaraes

Kerstin A Nagel

Anna Galinski

Jens Cohnen

Nicolai D Jablonowski

Caue Ribeiro

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In face of the alarming world population growth predictions and its threat to food security, the development of sustainable fertilizer alternatives is urgent. Moreover, fertilizer performance should be assessed not only in terms of yield but also in root system development, as it impacts soil fertility and crop productivity. Fertilizers containing a polysulfide matrix (PS) with dispersed struvite (St) were studied for S and P nutrition due to their controlled-release behavior. Soybean cultivation in a closed system with St/PS composites provided superior biomass compared to a reference of triple superphosphate (TSP) with ammonium sulfate (AS), with up to 3 and 10 times higher mass of shoots and roots, respectively. Root system architectural changes may explain these results, with a higher proliferation of second order lateral roots in response to struvite ongoing P delivery. The total root length was between 1,942 and 4,291 cm for plants under St/PS composites and only 982 cm with TSP/AS. While phosphorus uptake efficiency was similar in all fertilized treatments (11-14%), St/PS achieved a 22% sulfur uptake efficiency against only 8% from TSP/AS. Overall, the composites showed great potential as efficient slow-release fertilizers for enhanced soybean productivity.

References

Gruber B, Giehl R, Friedel S, von Wiren N . Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol. 2013; 163(1):161-79. PMC: 3762638. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.218453. View

Chalker J, Worthington M, Lundquist N, Esdaile L . Synthesis and Applications of Polymers Made by Inverse Vulcanization. Top Curr Chem (Cham). 2019; 377(3):16. DOI: 10.1007/s41061-019-0242-7. View

Robles-Aguilar A, Grunert O, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Mysara M, Meers E, Boon N . Effect of Applying Struvite and Organic N as Recovered Fertilizers on the Rhizosphere Dynamics and Cultivation of Lupine (). Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:572741. PMC: 7717983. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.572741. View

Talboys P, Heppell J, Roose T, Healey J, Jones D, Withers P . Struvite: a slow-release fertiliser for sustainable phosphorus management?. Plant Soil. 2016; 401:109-123. PMC: 4923718. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2747-3. View

Tansel B, Lunn G, Monje O . Struvite formation and decomposition characteristics for ammonia and phosphorus recovery: A review of magnesium-ammonia-phosphate interactions. Chemosphere. 2017; 194:504-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.004. View

Hossain Chowdhury M, Sultana T, Rahman M, Saha B, Chowdhury T, Tarafder S . Sulphur fertilization enhanced yield, its uptake, use efficiency and economic returns of L. Heliyon. 2020; 6(12):e05726. PMC: 7753130. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05726. View

Becana M, Wienkoop S, Matamoros M . Sulfur Transport and Metabolism in Legume Root Nodules. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:1434. PMC: 6192434. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01434. View

Valle S, Giroto A, Reis H, Guimaraes G, Ribeiro C . Synergy of Phosphate-Controlled Release and Sulfur Oxidation in Novel Polysulfide Composites for Sustainable Fertilization. J Agric Food Chem. 2021; 69(8):2392-2402. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07333. View

Lyu Y, Tang H, Li H, Zhang F, Rengel Z, Whalley W . Major Crop Species Show Differential Balance between Root Morphological and Physiological Responses to Variable Phosphorus Supply. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 7:1939. PMC: 5174099. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01939. View

10.

Mann M, Kruger J, Andari F, McErlean J, Gascooke J, Smith J . Sulfur polymer composites as controlled-release fertilisers. Org Biomol Chem. 2018; 17(7):1929-1936. DOI: 10.1039/c8ob02130a. View

11.

van Veelen A, Koebernick N, Scotson C, McKay-Fletcher D, Huthwelker T, Borca C . Root-induced soil deformation influences Fe, S and P: rhizosphere chemistry investigated using synchrotron XRF and XANES. New Phytol. 2019; 225(4):1476-1490. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16242. View

12.

Park K, Leitao E . The link to polysulfides and their applications. Chem Commun (Camb). 2021; 57(26):3190-3202. DOI: 10.1039/d1cc00505g. View

13.

Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramirez A, Herrera-Estrella L . The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003; 6(3):280-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00035-9. View

14.

Nagel K, Putz A, Gilmer F, Heinz K, Fischbach A, Pfeifer J . GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 39(11):891-904. DOI: 10.1071/FP12023. View

15.

Bogdan A, O Donnell C, Robles Aguilar A, Sigurnjak I, Power N, Michels E . Impact of time and phosphorus application rate on phosphorus bioavailability and efficiency of secondary fertilizers recovered from municipal wastewater. Chemosphere. 2021; 282:131017. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131017. View

16.

Chung W, Griebel J, Kim E, Yoon H, Simmonds A, Ji H . The use of elemental sulfur as an alternative feedstock for polymeric materials. Nat Chem. 2013; 5(6):518-24. DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1624. View

17.

Scholz R, Ulrich A, Eilitta M, Roy A . Sustainable use of phosphorus: a finite resource. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 461-462:799-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.043. View