How Media Use Influences the Fertility Intentions Among Chinese Women of Reproductive Age: A Perspective of Social Trust

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2022 May 27

PMID 35619808

Authors

Chuanlin Ning

Jing Wu

Yijie Ye

Nan Yang

Huacheng Pei

Hao Gao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The low fertility level has become a serious social problem in China. Previous research has argued the significant influence of media use and social trust on fertility intentions, but the interaction between the two variables and how they influence fertility intentions remain further investigation. This study explored the influence mechanism of media use on Chinese women's fertility intentions from the perspective of social trust.

Methods: This study collected data from the 2017 China General Social Survey, investigated the relationships between variables through bivariate correlation coefficients, and explored the differences in fertility intentions among women of reproductive age (20-49). Also, this paper examined the influence of media use and social trust by regression analysis and tested the mediating role of social trust between media use and fertility intentions with Bootstrap sampling.

Results: Women with different media use preferences, education levels, and family incomes have significant differences ( < 0.01) in fertility intentions. New media use negatively influences women's fertility intentions, while traditional media use has no significant influence on women's fertility intentions. Social trust significantly influenced women's fertility intentions and partially mediated the impact of new media use on fertility intentions.

Conclusion: Online communication influences fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age. It tends to influence their social trust by amplifying negative social news, affecting their fertility intentions further. This paper suggests the importance of strengthening social trust and online agenda-setting to improve women's fertility intentions that strategic information communication can change their perceptions of social trust.

Citing Articles

Examining Women's support for birth encouragement policies in China: an extension of the influence of presumed media influence model.

Li S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1391254.

PMID: 39712544 PMC: 11658992. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391254.

Exploring the first-time transition to parenthood in mainland China: a qualitative study on the experiences of fathers and mothers using the transition shock model.

Lang X, Zeng T, Ni S, Jiang L, Qian P, Wu M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1249211.

PMID: 38911952 PMC: 11192196. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1249211.

The mediating role of trust in government in intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions.

Zheng J, Wang X, Xie S, Wang H, Shen J, Zhang T Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1338122.

PMID: 38496397 PMC: 10941980. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1338122.

Can leisure and entertainment lifestyle promote health among older people living alone in China?-A simultaneous equation approach.

Qin Y, Liu J, Wang R, Qi X, Jiang S, Li J Front Public Health. 2022; 10:967170.

PMID: 36249231 PMC: 9558104. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.967170.

References

Morgan S . Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?. Demography. 2003; 40(4):589-603. PMC: 2849155. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037. View

Bein C, Mynarska M, Gauthier A . Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland. J Biosoc Sci. 2020; 53(3):419-435. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932020000280. View

Gray E, Evans A, Reimondos A . Childbearing desires of childless men and women: when are goals adjusted?. Adv Life Course Res. 2014; 18(2):141-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003. View

Paek H, Hove T . Effective strategies for responding to rumors about risks: The case of radiation-contaminated food in South Korea. Public Relat Rev. 2020; 45(3):101762. PMC: 7126673. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.006. View

Provencher V, Begin C, Tremblay A, Mongeau L, Boivin S, Lemieux S . Short-term effects of a "health-at-every-size" approach on eating behaviors and appetite ratings. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15(4):957-66. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.638. View

Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing Z . The effect of China's one-child family policy after 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(11):1171-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhpr051833. View

Liu P, Cao J, Nie W, Wang X, Tian Y, Ma C . The Influence of Internet Usage Frequency on Women's Fertility Intentions-The Mediating Effects of Gender Role Attitudes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(9). PMC: 8124929. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094784. View

MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V . A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(1):83-104. PMC: 2819363. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83. View

Knobloch-Westerwick S, Willis L, Kennard A . Media Impacts on Women's Fertility Desires: A Prolonged Exposure Experiment. J Health Commun. 2016; 21(6):647-57. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1153757. View

10.

Miller N, Pundak C, Cohen G, Issakov G, Gluska H, Gandelsman E . Can Social Support on Facebook Influence Fertility Outcomes?. Reprod Sci. 2021; 29(1):212-219. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00611-5. View

11.

Preis H, Tovim S, Mor P, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Samueloff A, Benyamini Y . Fertility intentions and the way they change following birth- a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):228. PMC: 7164284. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02922-y. View

12.

Aassve A, Billari F, Pessin L . Trust and Fertility Dynamics. Soc Forces. 2016; 95(2):663-692. PMC: 5167372. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sow080. View

13.

Harper J, Hammarberg K, Simopoulou M, Koert E, Pedro J, Massin N . The International Fertility Education Initiative: research and action to improve fertility awareness. Hum Reprod Open. 2021; 2021(4):hoab031. PMC: 8441587. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab031. View

14.

Billari F, Giuntella O, Stella L . Does broadband Internet affect fertility?. Popul Stud (Camb). 2019; 73(3):297-316. DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2019.1584327. View

15.

Morgan S, Taylor M . Low Fertility at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Annu Rev Sociol. 2011; 32:375-399. PMC: 2849172. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122220. View

16.

Cheng K . The Effect of Contraceptive Knowledge on Fertility: The Roles of Mass Media and Social Networks. J Fam Econ Issues. 2011; 32(2):257-267. PMC: 3084944. DOI: 10.1007/s10834-011-9248-1. View

17.

Hammarberg K, Norman R, Robertson S, McLachlan R, Michelmore J, Johnson L . Development of a health promotion programme to improve awareness of factors that affect fertility, and evaluation of its reach in the first 5 years. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018; 4:33-40. PMC: 5952837. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.002. View

18.

Balbo N, Billari F, Mills M . Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: un examen des recherches. Eur J Popul. 2013; 29(1):1-38. PMC: 3576563. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y. View

19.

MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Williams J . Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2010; 39(1):99. PMC: 2821115. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4. View

20.

Wei J, Xue J, Wang D . Socioeconomic determinants of rural women's desired fertility: A survey in rural Shaanxi, China. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0202968. PMC: 6136713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202968. View