» Articles » PMID: 35619589

Exploring Health-Related Quality of Life Burden in Peanut Allergy and the Potential Benefit of Oral Immunotherapy: Estimation of Health State Utility Values for Children and Adolescents and Their Caregivers

Overview
Date 2022 May 27
PMID 35619589
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to estimate utility values for health states relating to oral immunotherapy (OIT) for peanut allergy (PA), for children with PA and their caregivers.

Patients And Methods: Two methods were used: an online survey and structured interviews. Both methods assessed current utility/untreated PA (health-related quality of life, HRQoL) and HRQoL in different health states: "up-dosing phase of treatment", "maintenance phase" and "able to tolerate 6-8 peanuts if accidentally ingested". The survey was conducted in individuals with and without experience of OIT; data collected included the EQ-5D-Y (child states) and EQ-5D-5L (caregiver states).

Results: In total, 100 caregivers and 38 adolescents completed the treatment-naïve survey, a separate sample of 50 caregivers participated in structured interviews. Seven caregivers and two adolescents with experience of OIT for PA completed the survey. Data from the three samples were pooled, the mean utility values were untreated PA: 0.796 (child), 0.855 (caregiver); up-dosing: 0.711 (child), 0.806 (caregiver); maintenance: 0.821 (child), 0.849 (caregiver), tolerate 6-8 peanuts: 0.859 (child), 0.884 (caregiver). The results show a gain in utility of 0.063 for children and 0.029 for caregivers between the untreated and tolerate 6-8 peanuts health states.

Conclusion: This study is the first to assess utilities relating to OIT for PA. The results show the potential benefit of OIT for individuals with PA and their caregivers and provide values for use in cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Citing Articles

Estimating the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefit of Prophylactic Treatment for COVID-19 in Immunocompromised People: A Multimethod Valuation Study.

Gallop K, Hall R, Watt M, Squirrell D, Branscombe N, Arnetop S J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024; 11(2):20-28.

PMID: 39071729 PMC: 11276479. DOI: 10.36469/001c.120605.

References
1.
Bock S, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson H . Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107(1):191-3. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.112031. View

2.
Bollinger M, Dahlquist L, Mudd K, Sonntag C, Dillinger L, McKenna K . The impact of food allergy on the daily activities of children and their families. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 96(3):415-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60908-8. View

3.
Weinstein M, Torrance G, McGuire A . QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009; 12 Suppl 1:S5-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x. View

4.
DunnGalvin A, Gallop K, Acaster S, Timmermans F, Regent L, Schnadt S . APPEAL-2: A pan-European qualitative study to explore the burden of peanut-allergic children, teenagers and their caregivers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020; 50(11):1238-1248. PMC: 7780296. DOI: 10.1111/cea.13719. View

5.
Lamb A, Murray A, Lovett R . The Challenges of Measuring and Valuing Quality of Life in Preschool Children: A Retrospective Review of NICE Appraisals. Children (Basel). 2021; 8(9). PMC: 8464668. DOI: 10.3390/children8090765. View