» Articles » PMID: 35617355

Integrated Bioinformatics and Statistical Approaches to Explore Molecular Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35617355
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Integrated bioinformatics and statistical approaches are now playing the vital role in identifying potential molecular biomarkers more accurately in presence of huge number of alternatives for disease diagnosis, prognosis and therapies by reducing time and cost compared to the wet-lab based experimental procedures. Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths for women worldwide. Several dry-lab and wet-lab based studies have identified different sets of molecular biomarkers for BC. But they did not compare their results to each other so much either computationally or experimentally. In this study, an attempt was made to propose a set of molecular biomarkers that might be more effective for BC diagnosis, prognosis and therapies, by using the integrated bioinformatics and statistical approaches. At first, we identified 190 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between BC and control samples by using the statistical LIMMA approach. Then we identified 13 DEGs (AKR1C1, IRF9, OAS1, OAS3, SLCO2A1, NT5E, NQO1, ANGPT1, FN1, ATF6B, HPGD, BCL11A, and TP53INP1) as the key genes (KGs) by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Then we investigated the pathogenetic processes of DEGs highlighting KGs by GO terms and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Moreover, we disclosed the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory factors of KGs by their interaction network analysis with the transcription factors (TFs) and micro-RNAs. Both supervised and unsupervised learning's including multivariate survival analysis results confirmed the strong prognostic power of the proposed KGs. Finally, we suggested KGs-guided computationally more effective seven candidate drugs (NVP-BHG712, Nilotinib, GSK2126458, YM201636, TG-02, CX-5461, AP-24534) compared to other published drugs by cross-validation with the state-of-the-art alternatives top-ranked independent receptor proteins. Thus, our findings might be played a vital role in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis and therapies.

Citing Articles

Screening of common genomic biomarkers to explore common drugs for the treatment of pancreatic and kidney cancers with type-2 diabetes through bioinformatics analysis.

Ajadee A, Mahmud S, Sarkar A, Noor T, Ahmmed R, Haque Mollah M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7363.

PMID: 40025145 PMC: 11873208. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91875-3.


IL-1β and associated molecules as prognostic biomarkers linked with immune cell infiltration in colorectal cancer: an integrated statistical and machine learning approach.

Sahoo K, Sundararajan V Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):252.

PMID: 40019680 PMC: 11871282. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01989-3.


Prognostic Impact of Oncogenic Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Alterations in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors in a Real-World Setting.

Demirdjian L, Triantos S, Standish K, Thomas S, Xia Q, Zhang J Cancer Med. 2025; 14(4):e70546.

PMID: 40007233 PMC: 11862098. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70546.


Deciphering the prognostic impact of aberrant DNA methylation on ANGPT1 gene in breast cancer.

Alsaleem M, Sindi S, Alhazmi S, Hassan S, Ganash M, Alburae N Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6611.

PMID: 39994266 PMC: 11850880. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90001-7.


Exploring bacterial key genes and therapeutic agents for breast cancer among the Ghanaian female population: Insights from In Silico analyses.

Kibria M, Ali M, Haque Mollah M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312493.

PMID: 39585882 PMC: 11588272. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312493.


References
1.
Li Y, Zhou X, Liu J, Yin Y, Yuan X, Yang R . Differentially expressed genes and key molecules of -mutant breast cancer: evidence from bioinformatics analyses. PeerJ. 2020; 8:e8403. PMC: 6979404. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8403. View

2.
Chin C, Chen S, Wu H, Ho C, Ko M, Lin C . cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014; 8 Suppl 4:S11. PMC: 4290687. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11. View

3.
Kume T . The cooperative roles of Foxc1 and Foxc2 in cardiovascular development. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010; 665:63-77. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1599-3_5. View

4.
Khan A, Fornes O, Stigliani A, Gheorghe M, Castro-Mondragon J, van der Lee R . JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 46(D1):D1284. PMC: 5753202. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1188. View

5.
Li M, Jin L, Wang T, Feng Y, Pan C, Zhao D . Identification of potential core genes in triple negative breast cancer using bioinformatics analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2018; 11:4105-4112. PMC: 6054764. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S166567. View