» Articles » PMID: 35617232

5S Study: Safe and Simple Single Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation Using Sedation

Overview
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35617232
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation represents an energy source specific for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to describe the adoption and the process of streamlining procedures with a new ablation technology.

Methods: All-comer atrial fibrillation patients (n=191; mean age 69±12 years) underwent catheter ablation with a pulsed field ablation ablation device exclusively using analog-sedation. In the validation phase (n=25), device electrogram quality was compared with a circular mapping catheter to assess pulmonary vein isolation and esophageal temperature monitoring was used. In the streamline phase (n=166), a single-catheter approach was implemented. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 53 patients. In 52 patients, esophageal endoscopy was performed at day 1 after the procedure. Follow-up was performed using 72 hours Holter ECGs.

Results: On a pulmonary vein basis, pulmonary vein isolation rate was 100% including a single shot isolation rate of 99.5%. The electrogram information of the pulsed field ablation catheter and the circular mapping catheter were 100% congruent. Neither esophageal temperature rises nor esophageal thermal injury were observed. Two minor strokes occurred, presumable due to air embolism during catheter exchanges through the large bore sheath (13.8 F ID). In the streamline phase, reduced procedure times (46±14 versus 38±13 minutes, =0.004), no further strokes and a low incidence of silent cerebral injury (10/53 patients; 19%) were noted. During short-term follow-up, 17/191 patients (9%) had a atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

Conclusions: The pulsed field ablation device allows for simple and safe simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation using standard sedation protocols. Procedural speed and efficacy are remarkable and streamlining measures have added safety.

Citing Articles

[Guideline to safe and effective atrial fibrillation ablation with pulsed-field ablation using the pentaspline PFA system as an example].

Reinsch N, Johnson V, Rolf S, Busch S, Ebert M, Maurer T Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40019534 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-025-01071-z.


Electrographic Flow Mapping Provides Prognosis for AF Ablation Outcomes Across Two Independent Prospective Patient Cohorts.

Nilsson K, Anerao A, Kong M, Derejko P, Szili-Torok T, Goyal S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941362 PMC: 11818051. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030693.


Catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy: Advantages and limitations compared with conventional energy.

Kuroki K, Tada H J Arrhythm. 2025; 41(1):e70011.

PMID: 39906095 PMC: 11792576. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.70011.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


Safety and Efficacy of Pulse Field Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Comparison with Traditional Thermal Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gong A, Li W, Li F, Tong Y, Cao Y, Zeng R Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(11):415.

PMID: 39618880 PMC: 11607503. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2511415.