» Articles » PMID: 35616742

Effects of Experience on Recognition of Speech Produced with a Face Mask

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35616742
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past two years, face masks have been a critical tool for preventing the spread of COVID-19. While previous studies have examined the effects of masks on speech recognition, much of this work was conducted early in the pandemic. Given that human listeners are able to adapt to a wide variety of novel contexts in speech perception, an open question concerns the extent to which listeners have adapted to masked speech during the pandemic. In order to evaluate this, we replicated Toscano and Toscano (PLOS ONE 16(2):e0246842, 2021), looking at the effects of several types of face masks on speech recognition in different levels of multi-talker babble noise. We also examined the effects of listeners' self-reported frequency of encounters with masked speech and the effects of the implementation of public mask mandates on speech recognition. Overall, we found that listeners' performance in the current experiment (with data collected in 2021) was similar to that of listeners in Toscano and Toscano (with data collected in 2020) and that performance did not differ based on mask experience. These findings suggest that listeners may have already adapted to masked speech by the time data were collected in 2020, are unable to adapt to masked speech, require additional context to be able to adapt, or that talkers also changed their productions over time. Implications for theories of perceptual learning in speech are discussed.

Citing Articles

Effect of face masks on speech perception in noise of individuals with hearing aids.

Choi J, Choi H, Kim D, Park J, An Y, Shim H Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1036767.

PMID: 36532290 PMC: 9754666. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1036767.

References
1.
Thomas F, Allen C, Butts W, Rhoades C, Brandon C, Handrahan D . Does wearing a surgical facemask or N95-respirator impair radio communication?. Air Med J. 2011; 30(2):97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2010.12.007. View

2.
Magee M, Lewis C, Noffs G, Reece H, Chan J, Zaga C . Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(6):3562. PMC: 7857500. DOI: 10.1121/10.0002873. View

3.
Toscano J, McMurray B . Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics. Cogn Sci. 2011; 34(3):434-464. PMC: 3039883. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01077.x. View

4.
Oden G, Massaro D . Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychol Rev. 1978; 85(3):172-91. View

5.
Porschmann C, Lubeck T, Arend J . Impact of face masks on voice radiation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(6):3663. PMC: 7857507. DOI: 10.1121/10.0002853. View