» Articles » PMID: 35615732

Applicability of 14 Formulas for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in the Evaluation of Renal Function Before and After Nephron-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Renal Tumors

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35615732
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To compare the applicability of 14 equations of estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal function assessment of patients with renal tumors. Preoperative and postoperative GFR is measured by emission computed tomography (ECT) with 99mTc-DTPA as an imaging agent as reference GFR (rGFR) to compare with all formulas. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman agreement analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between rGFR and eGFR1 to 14 before and after surgery. A total of 50 cases including 22 males and 28 females were included. The results of preoperative eGFR1-14 correlated with rGFR ( < 0.05). The calculation results of all estimation formulas have a significant correlation with preoperative GFR. Preoperative MDRD-I, CKD-EPI , and FAS have good consistency. The CG formula has the highest precision and FAS has the highest accuracy. A total of 30 patients followed up after surgery, and postoperative rGFR correlated with CG, CKD-EPI, FAS, and BIS formulas ( < 0.05). But postoperative rGFR has no significant correlation with MDRD and Schwartz ( > 0.05). Postoperative CKD-EPI has best consistency, and FAS has the highest accuracy and precision. Our data suggest that eGFR equations evaluated by both serum creatinine (Scr) and cystatin C (SCysC) is not necessarily better than those evaluated by one of them alone. Among all enrolled equations, FAS is the best one to evaluate postoperative GFR in patients with renal tumors.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the clinical value of 10 estimating glomerular filtration rate equations and construction of a prediction model for kidney damage in adults from central China.

Wang X, Xu X, Wang Y, Liu L, Xu Y, Liu J Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1408503.

PMID: 38939508 PMC: 11208320. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1408503.

References
1.
Soares A, Prates A, Weinert L, Veronese F, de Azevedo M, Silveiro S . Reference values for glomerular filtration rate in healthy Brazilian adults. BMC Nephrol. 2013; 14:54. PMC: 3599407. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-54. View

2.
Levey A, Coresh J, Greene T, Marsh J, Stevens L, Kusek J . Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem. 2007; 53(4):766-72. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.077180. View

3.
Tang L, Ding X, Duan L, Li L, Lu H, Zhou F . A Regression Model to Predict Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Obstetric Patients and Effects on Vancomycin Treatment. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:622948. PMC: 8226118. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.622948. View

4.
Hsu C, Yang W, Parikh R, Anderson A, Chen T, Cohen D . Race, Genetic Ancestry, and Estimating Kidney Function in CKD. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(19):1750-1760. PMC: 8994696. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103753. View

5.
Mogueo A, Echouffo-Tcheugui J, Matsha T, Erasmus R, Kengne A . Validation of two prediction models of undiagnosed chronic kidney disease in mixed-ancestry South Africans. BMC Nephrol. 2015; 16:94. PMC: 4491228. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-015-0093-6. View