» Articles » PMID: 35615166

Previous Experience Seems Crucial to Eliminate the Sex Gap in Geometry Learning When Solving a Navigation Task in Rats ()

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 May 26
PMID 35615166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is much evidence, both in humans and rodents, that while navigating males tend to use geometric information whereas females rely more on landmarks. The present work attempts to alter the geometry bias in female rats. In Experiment 1 three groups of female rats were trained in a triangular-shaped pool to find a hidden platform, whose location was defined in terms of two sources of information, a landmark outside the pool and a particular corner of the pool. On a subsequent test trial with the triangular pool and no landmark, females with prior experience with two other pool shapes-with a kite-shaped pool and with a rectangular-shaped pool (Group Long Previous Experience, LPE), were significantly more accurate than control rats without such prior experience (Group No Previous Experience, NPE). Rats with a short previous experience-with the rectangular-shaped pool only (Group Short Previous Experience, SPE) did not differ from Group NPE. These results suggest that the previous experience with different shaped-pools could counteract the geometry bias in female rats. Then, Experiment 2A directly compared the performance of LPE males and females of Experiment 1, although conducting several test trials (i.e., shape, landmark, and preference). The differences between males and females disappeared in the three tests. Moreover, in a final test trial both males and females could identify the correct corner in an incomplete pool by its local, instead of global, properties. Finally, Experiment 2B compared the performance of NPE rats, males and females, of Experiment 1. On the test trial with the triangular pool and no landmark, males were significantly more accurate than females. The results are explained in the framework of selective attention.

Citing Articles

Are there sex differences in spatial reference memory in the Morris water maze? A large-sample experimental study.

Zorzo C, Arias J, Mendez M Learn Behav. 2023; 52(2):179-190.

PMID: 37723403 PMC: 11186955. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00598-w.

References
1.
Chamizo V, Urrutia M, Sanchez O, Calabrese M, Riccio O . Geometry learning while navigating: The importance of task difficulty and sex differences. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020; 46(4):470-483. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000246. View

2.
Golob E, Taube J . Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 136(1):309-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00184-5. View

3.
Albert D, Walsh M, Ryan J, Siemens Y . Mouse killing in rats: a comparison of spontaneous killers and rats with lesions of the medial hypothalamus or the medial accumbens nucleus. Physiol Behav. 1982; 29(6):989-94. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90288-8. View

4.
Cheng K . A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition. 1986; 23(2):149-78. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7. View

5.
Rodriguez C, Chamizo V, Mackintosh N . Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: the importance of sex differences. Learn Behav. 2011; 39(4):324-35. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-011-0027-5. View