» Articles » PMID: 35614435

Clinical Outcomes and Visual Prognostic Factors in Congenital Aniridia

Overview
Journal BMC Ophthalmol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 May 25
PMID 35614435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evaluate outcomes and identify prognostic factors in congenital aniridia.

Methods: Retrospective interventional case series of patients with congenital aniridia treated between 2012-2020. Ocular examination and surgical details were collected. Surgical failure was defined as disease progression or need for additional surgery for same/related indication. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Wilcoxon test, and univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed.

Results: Ninety-four patients with congenital aniridia presented at median 19.0 years. Two-thirds of patients underwent ≥ 1intraocular surgery, with average of 1.7 ± 2.3 surgeries/eye. At final follow-up (median 4.0 years), 45% of eyes had undergone lensectomy. Aphakic eyes showed worse visual acuity (VA) than phakic or pseudophakic eyes. Glaucoma affected 52% of eyes, of which half required IOP-lowering surgery. Glaucoma drainage devices showed the highest success rate (71%) at 14.2 ± 15.4 years of follow-up. Keratopathy affected 65% of eyes and one-third underwent corneal surgery. Keratoprosthesis had the longest survival rates at 10-years (64% with 95% CI [32,84]). LogMAR VA at presentation and final follow-up were not statistically different. Half of patients were legally blind at final follow-up. Final VA was associated with presenting VA, glaucoma diagnosis, and cataract or keratopathy at presentation. Penetrating keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis implantation correlated with worse BCVA.

Conclusions: Most aniridic patients in this large US-based cohort underwent at least 1 intraocular surgery. Cataract, glaucoma, and keratopathy were associated with worse VA and are important prognostic factors to consider when managing congenital aniridia.

Citing Articles

Superficial Keratectomy Alone versus in Combination with Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Aniridia-Associated Keratopathy and a Short-Term Clinical Outcome.

Wowra B, Wysocka-Kosmulska M, Dobrowolski D, Wylegala E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892970 PMC: 11173058. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113258.


Glaucoma drainage devices in children: an updated review.

Vasconcelos A, Massote J, Senger C, Prudente Barbieri L, Cronemberger S, Paula J Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024; 87(6):e2021.

PMID: 38597522 PMC: 11633839. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0338.


Challenges in Surgical Intervention for a Rare Case of Anterior Segment Dysgenesis: A Case Report.

Aldawood A, Bakri S, Alotaibi B Int Med Case Rep J. 2023; 16:579-584.

PMID: 37753202 PMC: 10519425. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S419685.


Visual Acuity in Aniridia and WAGR Syndrome.

Krause M, Trout K, Lauderdale J, Netland P Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:1255-1261.

PMID: 37152637 PMC: 10162095. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S405003.

References
1.
Yazdanpanah G, Bohm K, Hassan O, Karas F, Elhusseiny A, Nonpassopon M . Management of Congenital Aniridia-Associated Keratopathy: Long-Term Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 210:8-18. PMC: 6964251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.003. View

2.
Lee H, Khan R, OKeefe M . Aniridia: current pathology and management. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008; 86(7):708-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01427.x. View

3.
Chen T, Walton D . Goniosurgery for prevention of aniridic glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117(9):1144-8. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.9.1144. View

4.
Dyer A, De Faria A, Julio G, Alvarez de Toledo J, Barraquer R, Fideliz de la Paz M . Long-Term Anatomical and Functional Survival of Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Congenital Aniridia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:749063. PMC: 8514767. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.749063. View

5.
Bonneau S, Tong C, Yang Y, Harissi-Dagher M . The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022; 260(9):2781-2790. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05646-1. View