» Articles » PMID: 35613462

HLA-matching with PTCy: a Reanalysis of a CIBMTR Dataset with Propensity Score Matching and Donor Age

Overview
Journal Blood Adv
Specialty Hematology
Date 2022 May 25
PMID 35613462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) outcomes using haploidentical donors (Haplo) and posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis compare favorably to HLA-matched donors using calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis. A recent Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research analysis of patients receiving homogenous PTCy-based prophylaxis found that, with reduced intensity conditioning, Haplo BMTs had worse outcomes than matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMTs. Due to significant differences between groups, we reanalyzed the dataset using propensity score matching and, additionally, added a donor age variable. After matching MUD BMTs to Haplo BMTs in a 1:5 ratio, no significant differences were found between groups across all measured baseline characteristics. Outcomes analyses demonstrated no significant differences in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] of mortality with MUD vs Haplo [95% confidence interval], 0.95 [0.65-1.16], P = .75), disease-free survival (HR of relapse or death, 0.98 [0.73-1.18], P = .89), relapse rate (HR, 1.06 [0.77-1.38], P = .69), or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR, 0.85 [0.42-1.13], P = .49) between groups. After stratification by conditioning intensity, MUD BMTs in the reduced-intensity cohort had lower risk of NRM (HR, 0.56 [0.14-0.99], P = .05), with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. These results suggest the effect of HLA matching on BMT outcomes with PTCy is less meaningful than previously reported. Timely identification of a young, at least half-matched (related or unrelated) donor may be more important than finding a fully matched donor if the latter leads to a delay in BMT or use of an older donor.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of haploidentical transplants with PT-CY vs 10/10 MUD transplants with ATG in Germany.

Arslan A, Labuhn S, Sala E, Ringhoffer M, Schetelig J, Schroder T Blood Adv. 2024; 8(23):6104-6113.

PMID: 39368803 PMC: 11652758. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013719.


CAST Regimen for GvHD Prophylaxis: A CIBMTR Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Al-Homsi A, DeFor T, Cole K, Cirrone F, King S, Suarez-Londono A Transplant Cell Ther. 2024; 30(11):1092-1098.

PMID: 39209024 PMC: 11701941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.015.


Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors in acute myeloid leukemia.

Sugita J, Morita K, Konuma T, Yanada M Ann Hematol. 2024; 103(12):4851-4868.

PMID: 39153145 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05944-0.


Older MRD vs. younger MUD in patients older than 50 years with AML in remission using post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Piemontese S, Labopin M, Choi G, Broers A, Peccatori J, Meijer E Leukemia. 2024; 38(9):2016-2022.

PMID: 39048722 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02359-8.


Donor types and outcomes of transplantation in myelofibrosis: a CIBMTR study.

Jain T, Estrada-Merly N, Salas M, Kim S, DeVos J, Chen M Blood Adv. 2024; 8(16):4281-4293.

PMID: 38916866 PMC: 11372592. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013451.


References
1.
Luznik L, Pasquini M, Logan B, Soiffer R, Wu J, Devine S . Randomized Phase III BMT CTN Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Interventions in Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 40(4):356-368. PMC: 8797487. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02293. View

2.
Guru Murthy G, Kim S, Hu Z, Estrada-Merly N, Abid M, Aljurf M . Relapse and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Older Matched Sibling Donors vs Younger Matched Unrelated Donors. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(3):404-411. PMC: 8759031. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6846. View

3.
Fuchs E, McCurdy S, Solomon S, Wang T, Herr M, Modi D . HLA informs risk predictions after haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Blood. 2021; 139(10):1452-1468. PMC: 8914182. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013443. View

4.
Kollman C, HOWE C, Anasetti C, Antin J, Davies S, Filipovich A . Donor characteristics as risk factors in recipients after transplantation of bone marrow from unrelated donors: the effect of donor age. Blood. 2001; 98(7):2043-51. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.7.2043. View

5.
Bolanos-Meade J, Reshef R, Fraser R, Fei M, Abhyankar S, Al-Kadhimi Z . Three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) versus tacrolimus and methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease.... Lancet Haematol. 2019; 6(3):e132-e143. PMC: 6503965. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30221-7. View