» Articles » PMID: 35612673

Oestrogen Receptor Expression Distinguishes Non-ossifying Fibroma from Other Giant Cell Containing Bone Tumours

Overview
Journal Virchows Arch
Date 2022 May 25
PMID 35612673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-ossifying fibroma (NOF) and central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) are both benign tumours of bone with overlapping morphology and similar mutations in the RAS/MAPK pathway. However, NOF is located in the long bones with regression after puberty in contrast to CGCG which is located in the jaw bones and does not regress spontaneously. We hypothesised that endocrine regulation by oestrogen plays a role in the spontaneous regression in NOF. Therefore, we examined the expression of ERα in a series of NOF and CGCG. ERα expression (EP1) was determined using immunohistochemistry on 16 NOFs (whole slides), and 47 CGCGs (tissue microarrays (TMA's n = 41 and whole slide n = 6)). As comparison, we included TMAs of other giant cell containing bone lesions: giant cell tumour of bone (n = 75), chondroblastoma (n = 12), chondromyxoid fibroma (n = 12), aneurysmal bone cyst (n = 6) and telangiectatic osteosarcoma (n = 6). All 16 NOF samples demonstrated ERα protein expression, while all 47 CGCG and all other giant cell containing bone tumours were negative. Most NOF samples had moderate staining intensity and between 24 and 49% of the spindle cells were ERα-positive. Our findings further support the role of endocrine regulation via oestrogen in the spontaneous regression in NOF. Whether oestrogen signalling at puberty is involved in the induction of senescence in the neoplastic cells of NOF harbouring RAS/MAPK pathway mutations needs further research. Since ERα expression was not observed in other giant cell containing bone lesions with overlapping morphological features, positive ERα expression may favour the diagnosis of NOF in challenging diagnostic cases.

Citing Articles

Non-ossifying fibroma of the mandible in a 4-year-old child: A rare case and review of the literature.

Zheng Q, Kong J, Zeng T, Cao Z SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023; 11:2050313X231192752.

PMID: 37560383 PMC: 10408311. DOI: 10.1177/2050313X231192752.

References
1.
de Lange J, van den Akker H, van den Berg H . Central giant cell granuloma of the jaw: a review of the literature with emphasis on therapy options. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104(5):603-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.003. View

2.
Gomes C, Gomez R . MAPK pathway-activating mutations drive giant cell lesions of the jaws and non-ossifying fibromas of bone. J Pathol. 2019; 248(1):123-124. DOI: 10.1002/path.5235. View

3.
Cheang M, Treaba D, Speers C, Olivotto I, Bajdik C, Chia S . Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(36):5637-44. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4155. View

4.
Romeo S, Szuhai K, Nishimori I, Ijszenga M, Wijers-Koster P, Taminiau A . A balanced t(5;17) (p15;q22-23) in chondroblastoma: frequency of the re-arrangement and analysis of the candidate genes. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:393. PMC: 2778658. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-393. View

5.
Boon E, van der Graaf W, Gelderblom H, Tesselaar M, van Es R, Oosting S . Impact of chemotherapy on the outcome of osteosarcoma of the head and neck in adults. Head Neck. 2016; 39(1):140-146. PMC: 5215442. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24556. View