» Articles » PMID: 35609488

Novel TB Smear Microscopy Automation System in Detecting Acid-fast Bacilli for Tuberculosis - A Multi-center Double Blind Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to COVID-19 pandemic, there is a large global drop in the number of newly diagnosed cases with tuberculosis (TB) worldwide. Actions to mitigate and reverse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TB are urgently needed. Recent development of TB smear microscopy automation systems using artificial intelligence may increase the sensitivity of TB smear microscopy. The objective is to evaluate the performance of an automation system (μ-Scan 2.0, Wellgen Medical) over manual smear microscopy in a multi-center, double-blind trial. Total of 1726 smears were enrolled. Referee medical technician and culture served as primary and secondary gold standards for result discrepancy. Results showed that, compared to manual microscopy, the μ-Scan 2.0's performance of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 95.7% (1651/1726), 87.7% (57/65), and 96.0% (1594/1661), respectively. The negative predictive value was 97.8% at prevalence of 8.2%. Manual smear microscopy remains the primary diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Use of automation system could achieve higher TB smear sensitivity and laboratory efficiency. It can also serve as a screening tool that complements molecular methods to reduce the total cost for TB diagnosis and control. Furthermore, such automation system is capable of remote access by internet connection and can be deployed in area with limited medical resources.

Citing Articles

Automatic identification of clinically important species by artificial intelligence-based image recognition: proof-of-concept study.

Tsang C, Zhao C, Liu Y, Lin K, Tang J, Cheng K Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 14(1):2434573.

PMID: 39585232 PMC: 11632928. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2434573.


Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using an Intelligent Microscopy Scanner and Image Recognition Model for Improved Acid-Fast Bacilli Detection in Smears.

Chen W, Chang C, Lin Y Microorganisms. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39203575 PMC: 11356913. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12081734.


Retrospective validation of MetaSystems' deep-learning-based digital microscopy platform with assistance compared to manual fluorescence microscopy for detection of mycobacteria.

Desruisseaux C, Broderick C, Lavergne V, Sy K, Garcia D, Barot G J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(3):e0106923.

PMID: 38299829 PMC: 10935628. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01069-23.


Evaluation of MetaSystems Automated Fluorescent Microscopy System for the Machine-Assisted Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Clinical Samples.

Tomasello G, Foroughi F, Padron D, Moreno A, Banaei N J Clin Microbiol. 2022; 60(10):e0113122.

PMID: 36121216 PMC: 9580351. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01131-22.

References
1.
Xiong Y, Ba X, Hou A, Zhang K, Chen L, Li T . Automatic detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis using artificial intelligence. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(3):1936-1940. PMC: 5906344. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.91. View

2.
Lopez-Garnier S, Sheen P, Zimic M . Automatic diagnostics of tuberculosis using convolutional neural networks analysis of MODS digital images. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0212094. PMC: 6392246. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212094. View

3.
Mnyambwa N, Ngadaya E, Kimaro G, Kim D, Kazwala R, Petrucka P . Assessment of sputum smear-positive but culture-negative results among newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tanzania. Int J Gen Med. 2017; 10:199-205. PMC: 5513826. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S137469. View

4.
Lewis J, Chihota V, van der Meulen M, Fourie P, Fielding K, Grant A . "Proof-of-concept" evaluation of an automated sputum smear microscopy system for tuberculosis diagnosis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e50173. PMC: 3510232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050173. View

5.
Steingart K, Henry M, Ng V, Hopewell P, Ramsay A, Cunningham J . Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006; 6(9):570-81. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70578-3. View