» Articles » PMID: 35604421

Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecology

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 May 23
PMID 35604421
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: The current terminology used to describe cosmetic gynecologic procedures includes many nondescriptive, trademarked, or informal names, which contributes to substantial ambiguity about their aims and specific techniques. The development of clear, uniform descriptive terminology for cosmetic gynecology is needed for patients, researchers, and practitioners across multiple specialties.

Methods: This document was developed from a collaboration of selected members from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Wide-ranging literature reviews were performed to identify the breadth of currently used terms and tools for measuring efficacy and safety. After extensive internal review the adoption of each definition was ratified by group consensus.

Results: A terminology report for elective cosmetic gynecology procedures, anatomical classification, outcome metrics, and reporting of complications has been developed. This document seeks to provide clear descriptive guidance for patients, researchers, and practitioners across multiple specialties. This document will be subject to internal review by IUGA and AUGS to incorporate and adopt evidence-based changes in the field.

Conclusions: A consensus-based document establishing clear terminology for cosmetic gynecology procedures has been created. Use of these terms should be encouraged to provide clarity to patients seeking these procedures and to facilitate future research to establish the safety and efficacy of these procedures.

Citing Articles

Clinical, Ethical, and Legal Considerations Raised by Self-Reported Genital Mutilation Following Voluntary Cosmetic Labiaplasty.

Metaxas T, Earp B, Bader D, Ghasemi S, Solari M, Abdulcadir J Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 54(1):399-415.

PMID: 39730955 PMC: 11782373. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-03058-2.


Levator Ani Deficiency and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 1 Year Postpartum: A Prospective Nested Case-Control Study.

Jansson M, Brismar Wendel S, Rotstein E BJOG. 2024; 132(5):596-605.

PMID: 39623952 PMC: 11879914. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.18036.


Cosmetic Gynecology: Is There Enough Exposure in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency?.

Sinha A, Yao M, Lee S, Wood N, Reed V, Wallace S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65564.

PMID: 39192921 PMC: 11349245. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65564.

References
1.
Liao L, Creighton S . Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: how should healthcare providers respond?. BMJ. 2007; 334(7603):1090-2. PMC: 1877941. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39206.422269.BE. View

2.
Alshiek J, Garcia B, Minassian V, Iglesia C, Clark A, Sokol E . Vaginal Energy-Based Devices. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020; 26(5):287-298. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000872. View

3.
Tadir Y, Gaspar A, Lev-Sagie A, Alexiades M, Alinsod R, Bader A . Light and energy based therapeutics for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Consensus and controversies. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 49(2):137-159. PMC: 5819602. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22637. View

4.
Shobeiri S, Kerkhof M, Minassian V, Bazi T . IUGA committee opinion: laser-based vaginal devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and vaginal laxity. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 30(3):371-376. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3830-0. View

5.
Preti M, Vieira-Baptista P, Digesu G, Bretschneider C, Damaser M, Demirkesen O . The clinical role of LASER for vulvar and vaginal treatments in gynecology and female urology: An ICS/ISSVD best practice consensus document. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38(3):1009-1023. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23931. View