» Articles » PMID: 35599669

Investigation of Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality in a University Campus During COVID-19 Lock Down Period

Overview
Journal Build Environ
Date 2022 May 23
PMID 35599669
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pandemic of COVID-19 currently shadows the world; the whole earth has been on an unprecedented lockdown. Social distancing among people interrupted domestic and international air traffic, suspended industrial productions and economic activities, and had various far-reaching and undetermined implications on air quality. Improvement in air quality has been reported in many cities during the lockdown. On March 22, 2020, the Turkish government enforced strict lockdown measures to reduce coronavirus disease transmission. This lockdown had a significant impact on the movement of people within the country, which resulted in a major drop in worldwide commercial activities. During this period, university campuses were emptied due to the transition to distance education. In this study, various air pollutants sulfur dioxide (SO), nitrogen dioxide (NO), ozone (O), fine particulate matter (PM), total bacteria, and total fungi were measured in different indoor environments at Eskişehir Technical University Campus in Eskişehir, Turkey during COVID-19 lock down period. Also, to calculate the indoor and outdoor ratios (I/O) of the pollutants, simultaneous outdoor measurements were also carried out. The average indoor SO NO O and PM concentrations in different indoor environments ranged between 2.10 and 54.58, 1.36-30.89, 12.01-39.05, and 21-94 μg/m, respectively. The total number of bacteria and fungi ranged between 21.83-514.15 and 13.10-83.36 CFU/m, respectively. Our study intends to give a glimpse to quantify the impact of a pandemic on air quality in different indoor environments in a university campus in Eskişehir, Turkey and calls for follow-up studies. Indoor concentrations were evaluated together with outdoor concentrations. In general, it can be said that the calculated I/O ratios for SO, NO, O, bacteria, and fungi were less than 1 in most indoor environments.

Citing Articles

Indoor Air Quality and Bioaerosols in Spanish University Classrooms.

Fuentes-Ferragud E, Lopez A, Piera J, Yusa V, Garrigues S, de la Guardia M Toxics. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38535960 PMC: 10975315. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12030227.


Bioaerosol assessment in indoor and outdoor environments: a case study from India.

Jabeen R, Kizhisseri M, Mayanaik S, Mohamed M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18066.

PMID: 37872255 PMC: 10593752. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44315-z.


Health risk assessment of particulate matter 2.5 in an academic metallurgy workshop.

Mbazima S Indoor Air. 2022; 32(9):e13111.

PMID: 36168227 PMC: 9825944. DOI: 10.1111/ina.13111.

References
1.
Meadow J, Altrichter A, Kembel S, Kline J, Mhuireach G, Moriyama M . Indoor airborne bacterial communities are influenced by ventilation, occupancy, and outdoor air source. Indoor Air. 2013; 24(1):41-8. PMC: 4285785. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12047. View

2.
Jorres R, Nowak D, Magnussen H . The effect of ozone exposure on allergen responsiveness in subjects with asthma or rhinitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 153(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542163. View

3.
Zhao Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Ferm M, Liang Y, Norback D . Asthmatic symptoms among pupils in relation to winter indoor and outdoor air pollution in schools in Taiyuan, China. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116(1):90-7. PMC: 2199281. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10576. View

4.
Pinault L, Crouse D, Jerrett M, Brauer M, Tjepkema M . Spatial associations between socioeconomic groups and NO2 air pollution exposure within three large Canadian cities. Environ Res. 2016; 147:373-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.033. View

5.
Ciccone G, Forastiere F, Agabiti N, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Chellini E . Road traffic and adverse respiratory effects in children. SIDRIA Collaborative Group. Occup Environ Med. 1999; 55(11):771-8. PMC: 1757532. DOI: 10.1136/oem.55.11.771. View