Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Identify the Immunocytochemical Markers Effective in Delineating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Lesions in FNAC Samples
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Conventional cytology-based diagnosis for thyroid cancer is limited with more than 30-45% of nodules categorized as indeterminate, necessitating surgery for confirming or refuting the diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed at identifying immunocytochemical markers effective in delineating benign from malignant thyroid lesions in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples, thereby improving the accuracy of cytology diagnosis. A systematic review of relevant articles (2000-2021) from online databases was carried out and the search protocol registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42021229121). The quality of studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Review Manager 5.4.1 from Cochrane collaboration and MetaDisc Version 1.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Bias in the studies were visually analyzed using funnel plots, and statistical significance was evaluated by Egger's test. Systematic review identified 64 original articles, while meta-analysis in eligible articles (n = 41) identified a panel of 5 markers, Galectin-3, HBME-1, CK-19, CD-56, and TPO. Assessment of the diagnostic performance revealed that Gal-3 (sensitivity: 0.81; CI: 0.79-0.83; specificity: 0.84; CI: 0.82-0.85) and HBME-1 (sensitivity: 0.83; Cl: 0.81-0.86; specificity: 0.85; CI: 0.83-0.86) showed high accuracy in delineating benign from malignant thyroid nodules. Efficacy analysis in indeterminate nodules showed Gal-3 and HBME-1 have high specificity of 0.86 (CI 0.84-0.89) and 0.82 (CI 0.78-0.86), respectively, and low sensitivity of 0.76 (CI 0.72-0.80) and 0.75 (CI 0.70-0.80), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of Galectin-3 and HBME-1 were 39.18 (CI 23.38-65.65) and 24.44 (CI 11.16-53.54), respectively. Significant publication bias was observed for the markers Galectin-3 and CK-19 (p < 0.05). The panel of 5 markers identified from this meta-analysis are high-confidence candidates that need to be validated in thyroid cytology to establish their efficacy and enable clinical applicability.
Wang X, Zhou H, Iqbal M, Pan D, Zuo J, Moazzam N Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(3):e41196.
PMID: 39836565 PMC: 11749504. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041196.
Management of Thyroid Nodules.
Uludag M, Unlu M, Kostek M, Aygun N, Caliskan O, Ozel A Sisli Etfal Hastan Tıp Bul. 2023; 57(3):287-304.
PMID: 37900341 PMC: 10600596. DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2023.06992.
2023 European Thyroid Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for thyroid nodule management.
Durante C, Hegedus L, Czarniecka A, Paschke R, Russ G, Schmitt F Eur Thyroid J. 2023; 12(5).
PMID: 37358008 PMC: 10448590. DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-23-0067.
Bernardi S, Taccogna S, DAngelo M, Giudici F, Mauri G, Raggiunti B Int J Endocrinol. 2023; 2023:7951942.
PMID: 37082757 PMC: 10113047. DOI: 10.1155/2023/7951942.