» Articles » PMID: 35596151

Detecting Accelerometer Non-wear Periods Using Change in Acceleration Combined with Rate-of-change in Temperature

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 May 20
PMID 35596151
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accelerometery is commonly used to estimate physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behavior. In free-living conditions, periods of device removal (non-wear) can lead to misclassification of behavior with consequences for research outcomes and clinical decision making. Common methods for non-wear detection are limited by data transformations (e.g., activity counts) or algorithm parameters such as minimum durations or absolute temperature thresholds that risk over- or under-estimating non-wear time. This study aimed to advance non-wear detection methods by integrating a 'rate-of-change' criterion for temperature into a combined temperature-acceleration algorithm.

Methods: Data were from 39 participants with neurodegenerative disease (36% female; age: 45-83 years) who wore a tri-axial accelerometer (GENEActiv) on their wrist 24-h per day for 7-days as part of a multi-sensor protocol. The reference dataset was derived from visual inspection conducted by two expert analysts. Linear regression was used to establish temperature rate-of-change as a criterion for non-wear detection. A classification and regression tree (CART) decision tree classifier determined optimal parameters separately for non-wear start and end detection. Classifiers were trained using data from 15 participants (38.5%). Outputs from the CART analysis were supplemented based on edge cases and published parameters.

Results: The dataset included 186 non-wear periods (85.5% < 60 min). Temperature rate-of-change over the first five minutes of non-wear was - 0.40 ± 0.17 °C/minute and 0.36 ± 0.21 °C/minute for the first five minutes following device donning. Performance of the DETACH (DEvice Temperature and Accelerometer CHange) algorithm was improved compared to existing algorithms with recall of 0.942 (95% CI 0.883 to 1.0), precision of 0.942 (95% CI 0.844 to 1.0), F1-Score of 0.942 (95% CI 0.880 to 1.0) and accuracy of 0.996 (0.994-1.000).

Conclusion: The DETACH algorithm accurately detected non-wear intervals as short as five minutes; improving non-wear classification relative to current interval-based methods. Using temperature rate-of-change combined with acceleration results in a robust algorithm appropriate for use across different temperature ranges and settings. The ability to detect short non-wear periods is particularly relevant to free-living scenarios where brief but frequent removals occur, and for clinical application where misclassification of behavior may have important implications for healthcare decision-making.

Citing Articles

A proof of concept for wear/non-wear classification using accelerometer data in daily activity recording: Synthetic algorithm leveraging probability and continuity of zero counts.

Nishiyama N, Konda S, Ogasawara I, Nakata K PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0309917.

PMID: 39436886 PMC: 11495570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309917.


Mitigating data quality challenges in ambulatory wrist-worn wearable monitoring through analytical and practical approaches.

Van Der Donckt J, Vandenbussche N, Van Der Donckt J, Chen S, Stojchevska M, De Brouwer M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17545.

PMID: 39079945 PMC: 11289092. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67767-3.


SciKit digital health package for accelerometry-measured physical activity: comparisons to existing solutions and investigations of age effects in healthy adults.

Lin W, Karahanoglu F, Demanuele C, Khan S, Cai X, Santamaria M Front Digit Health. 2023; 5:1321086.

PMID: 38090655 PMC: 10715430. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1321086.


Wrist Accelerometer Estimates of Physical Activity Intensity During Walking in Older Adults and People Living With Complex Health Conditions: Retrospective Observational Data Analysis Study.

Weber K, Godkin F, Cornish B, McIlroy W, Van Ooteghem K JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e41685.

PMID: 36920452 PMC: 10131658. DOI: 10.2196/41685.


Generalizability and performance of methods to detect non-wear with free-living accelerometer recordings.

Skovgaard E, Roswall M, Pedersen N, Larsen K, Grontved A, Brond J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2496.

PMID: 36782015 PMC: 9925815. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29666-x.


References
1.
Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M . A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012; 9:21. PMC: 3354997. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-21. View

2.
Grant D, Tomlinson D, Tsintzas K, Kolic P, Onambele-Pearson G . The Effects of Displacing Sedentary Behavior With Two Distinct Patterns of Light Activity on Health Outcomes in Older Adults (Implications for COVID-19 Quarantine). Front Physiol. 2021; 11:574595. PMC: 7793876. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574595. View

3.
Choi L, Ward S, Schnelle J, Buchowski M . Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(10):2009-16. PMC: 3443532. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258cb36. View

4.
van Hees V, Gorzelniak L, Dean Leon E, Eder M, Pias M, Taherian S . Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61691. PMC: 3634007. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061691. View

5.
Carson V, Wong S, Winkler E, Healy G, Colley R, Tremblay M . Patterns of sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk among Canadian adults. Prev Med. 2014; 65:23-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.005. View