» Articles » PMID: 35594923

The Interaction of Spongistatin 1 with Tubulin

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 2022 May 20
PMID 35594923
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A tritiated derivative of the sponge-derived natural product spongistatin 1 was prepared, and its interactions with tubulin were examined. [H]Spongistatin 1 was found to bind rapidly to tubulin at a single site (the low specific activity of the [H]spongistatin 1, 0.75 Ci/mmol, prevented our defining an association rate), and the inability of spongistatin 1 to cause an aberrant assembly reaction was confirmed. Spongistatin 1 bound to tubulin very tightly, and we could detect no significant dissociation reaction from tubulin. The tubulin-[H]spongistatin 1 complex did dissociate in 8 M urea, so there was no evidence for covalent bond formation. Apparent K values were obtained by Scatchard analysis of binding data and by Hummel-Dreyer chromatography (3.5 and 1.1 μM, respectively). The effects of a large cohort of vinca domain drugs on the binding of [H]spongistatin 1 to tubulin were evaluated. Compounds that did not cause aberrant assembly reactions (halichondrin B, eribulin, maytansine, and rhizoxin) caused little inhibition of [H]spongistatin 1 binding. Little inhibition also occurred with the peptides dolastatin 15, its active pentapeptide derivative, vitilevuamide, or diazonamide A, nor with the vinca alkaloid vinblastine. Strong inhibition was observed with dolastatin 10, hemiasterlin, and cryptophycin 1, all of which cause aberrant assembly reactions that might actually mask the spongistatin 1 binding site. Spongistatin 5 was found to be a competitive inhibitor of [H]spongistatin 1 binding, with an apparent K of 2.2 μM. We propose that the strong picomolar cytotoxicity of spongistatin 1 probably derives from its extremely tight binding to tubulin.

Citing Articles

Immunomodulatory Effects of Halichondrin Isolated from Marine Sponges and Its Synthetic Analogs in Oncological Applications.

Dissanayake D, Nagahawatta D, Lee J, Jeon Y Mar Drugs. 2024; 22(9).

PMID: 39330307 PMC: 11432918. DOI: 10.3390/md22090426.

References
1.
Peerzada M, Hamel E, Bai R, Supuran C, Azam A . Deciphering the key heterocyclic scaffolds in targeting microtubules, kinases and carbonic anhydrases for cancer drug development. Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 225:107860. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107860. View

2.
Verdier-Pinard P, Kepler J, Pettit G, Hamel E . Sustained intracellular retention of dolastatin 10 causes its potent antimitotic activity. Mol Pharmacol. 2000; 57(1):180-7. View

3.
Wang Y, Benz F, Wu Y, Wang Q, Chen Y, Chen X . Structural Insights into the Pharmacophore of Vinca Domain Inhibitors of Microtubules. Mol Pharmacol. 2015; 89(2):233-42. DOI: 10.1124/mol.115.100149. View

4.
Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P, Shoemaker R, Paull K, Vistica D . Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83(11):757-66. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/83.11.757. View

5.
Waight A, Bargsten K, Doronina S, Steinmetz M, Sussman D, Prota A . Structural Basis of Microtubule Destabilization by Potent Auristatin Anti-Mitotics. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0160890. PMC: 4982639. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160890. View