» Articles » PMID: 35592400

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to construct and validate several machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict long-term mortality and identify risk factors in unselected patients post-cardiac surgery.

Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database was used to perform a retrospective administrative database study. Candidate predictors consisted of the demographics, comorbidity, vital signs, laboratory test results, scoring systems, and treatment information on the first day of ICU admission. Four-year mortality was set as the study outcome. We used the ML methods of logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (NNET), naïve bayes (NB), gradient boosting machine (GBM), adapting boosting (Ada), random forest (RF), bagged trees (BT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The prognostic capacity and clinical utility of these ML models were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Of 7,368 patients in MIMIC-III included in the final cohort, a total of 1,337 (18.15%) patients died during a 4-year follow-up. Among 65 variables extracted from the database, a total of 25 predictors were selected using recursive feature elimination and included in the subsequent analysis. The Ada model performed best among eight models in both discriminatory ability with the highest AUC of 0.801 and goodness of fit (visualized by calibration curve). Moreover, the DCA shows that the net benefit of the RF, Ada, and BT models surpassed that of other ML models for almost all threshold probability values. Additionally, through the Ada technique, we determined that red blood cell distribution width (RDW), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), SAPS II, anion gap (AG), age, urine output, chloride, creatinine, congestive heart failure, and SOFA were the Top 10 predictors in the feature importance rankings.

Conclusions: The Ada model performs best in predicting 4-year mortality after cardiac surgery among the eight ML models, which might have significant application in the development of early warning systems for patients following operations.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Mortality Predictors Using a Machine-Learning Approach in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Peripheral Vascular Intervention.

Callegari S, Romain G, Cleman J, Scierka L, Jacque F, Smolderen K J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(10):e034477.

PMID: 38761075 PMC: 11179837. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034477.


Association Between the Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and 30-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study Based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Database.

Chen W, Yu P, Chen C, Cai S, Chen J, Zheng C Ann Lab Med. 2024; 44(5):401-409.

PMID: 38469636 PMC: 11169773. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2023.0345.


Machine learning algorithms' application to predict childhood vaccination among children aged 12-23 months in Ethiopia: Evidence 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey dataset.

Demsash A, Chereka A, Walle A, Kassie S, Bekele F, Bekana T PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0288867.

PMID: 37851705 PMC: 10584162. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288867.


Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support for monitoring patients in cardiovascular ICUs: A systematic review.

Moazemi S, Vahdati S, Li J, Kalkhoff S, Castano L, Dewitz B Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1109411.

PMID: 37064042 PMC: 10102653. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1109411.


Predicting the unpredictable in cardiothoracic surgery.

Yadava O Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 39(2):109-111.

PMID: 36785611 PMC: 9918619. DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01478-8.


References
1.
Shahian D, OBrien S, Filardo G, Ferraris V, Haan C, Rich J . The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88(1 Suppl):S2-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053. View

2.
Kieser T, Rose M, Head S . Comparison of logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in predicting operative mortality of 1125 total arterial operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50(3):509-18. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw072. View

3.
Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Sinha S, Cocomello L, Gibbison B, Caputo M . Machine learning improves mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 163(6):2075-2087.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.105. View

4.
Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos G, Kaafarani H . Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Ann Surg. 2018; 268(4):574-583. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002956. View

5.
Macrina F, Puddu P, Sciangula A, Trigilia F, Totaro M, Miraldi F . Artificial neural networks versus multiple logistic regression to predict 30-day mortality after operations for type a ascending aortic dissection. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2009; 3:81-95. PMC: 2720513. DOI: 10.2174/1874192400903010081. View