» Articles » PMID: 35589766

Cannabis Consumption and Prosociality

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 19
PMID 35589766
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The existing literature largely focuses on health risks and other pharmacodynamics of using cannabis, with fewer investigations of other normative psychological effects from consumption among otherwise healthy people. We measured several basic constructs of social psychology corresponding to the concept of prosociality among 146 healthy young adults between 18 and 25 years (M = 18.9, SD = 1.4) with varying detectable levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in their urine, controlling for participant's sex, age, ethnicity, and childhood socio-economic status. Compared to THC-free individuals, cannabis users scored higher than non-users on validated measures of Prosocial Behaviors (d = .34, p = .04), the Empathy Quotient (d = .36, p < .01), Moral Harmlessness (d = .76, p < .01) and Moral Fairness (d = .49, p < .01), but exhibited a lower sense of Ingroup Loyalty (d = .33, p = .04). Relative to THC-free, same-sex individuals, female cannabis users scored significantly higher on measurements of Aggression (ds = .65 and .57, ps < .05) and male users scored higher on the Agreeableness dimension of personality (d = .91, p < .01).. Linear associations were found between the recency of last cannabis usage and the Prosocial Behaviors, Empathy Quotient, Moral Harmlessness, Moral Fairness and Agreeableness personality scores (rs from - .24 to .38, ps < .05). The findings suggest cannabis usage is associated with an increased sense of prosociality and prioritization of humanitarian behaviors that declines with time following cannabis consumption. Further research should focus on heterogeneity in the effects of cannabis consumption across users.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the relationship between marijuana use, aggressive behaviors, and victimization: an epidemiological study in colombian adolescents.

Scoppetta O, Cardozo F, Brown E, Morales V Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2025; .

PMID: 39882765 DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2024-0167.


Dental injuries in Swiss soccer supporters: A comparative study of regular fans, ultras, and hooligans for public health strategies.

Schneider C, Simonek M, Eggmann F, Filippi A Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023; 9(6):1214-1222.

PMID: 37735812 PMC: 10728521. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.783.

References
1.
Macleod J, Oakes R, Copello A, Crome I, Egger M, Hickman M . Psychological and social sequelae of cannabis and other illicit drug use by young people: a systematic review of longitudinal, general population studies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9421):1579-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16200-4. View

2.
Campos A, Moreira F, Gomes F, Del Bel E, Guimaraes F . Multiple mechanisms involved in the large-spectrum therapeutic potential of cannabidiol in psychiatric disorders. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367(1607):3364-78. PMC: 3481531. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0389. View

3.
Miczek K . delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: antiaggressive effects in mice, rats, and squirrel monkeys. Science. 1978; 199(4336):1459-61. DOI: 10.1126/science.415367. View

4.
Zimmermann K, Walz C, Derckx R, Kendrick K, Weber B, Dore B . Emotion regulation deficits in regular marijuana users. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(8):4270-4279. PMC: 6866842. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23671. View

5.
Green B, Kavanagh D, Young R . Being stoned: a review of self-reported cannabis effects. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2003; 22(4):453-60. DOI: 10.1080/09595230310001613976. View