» Articles » PMID: 35587940

Perceived Barriers to Facemask Adherence in the Covid-19 Pandemic in Pakistan-A Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 May 19
PMID 35587940
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore perceived barriers associated with facemask adherence to prevent spread of COVID-19 spread in Pakistani population.

Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted from 25-July 2020 to 5-August 2020. Participants of both genders of age >17 years, currently residing in Pakistan, who had access to internet and understood English were included in the survey. The survey was designed on Google form and was distributed digitally across different areas of Pakistan via social media. Survey included questions regarding socio-demographics, facemask adherence and perceived barriers related to facemask adherence such as perceived risks, health concerns, comfort, social influences, religious/cultural norms and social protocols and health recommendations. SPSS version 23 was used to analyze data. Independent t-test/One-way ANOVA was applied to assess significant difference between perceived barriers to wear face mask and socio-demographic factors, p-value ≤0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Post-hoc LSD test was also applied where applicable.

Results: Only 20% of the participants reported non-adherence to facemask. Amongst these participants, majority agreed that comfort was the main barrier precluding them from wearing a mask, 89.4% subjects saying that it was too hot to wear it and 84.1% saying that a mask was too uncomfortable to wear. Whereas, 82.1% highly agreed that difficulty in breathing is perceived barrier related to facemask usage. Statistically significant difference was found between health concerns with gender (p = 0.031), locality (p = 0.001) and religion (p = 0.03); comfort with locality (p = 0.007); social influences with gender (p = 0.001), ethnicity (p = 0.001) and locality (p = 0.017); cultural/religious norms with religion (p = 0.001) and social protocols and health recommendations with age (p = 0.015).

Conclusion: Despite of satisfactory facemask adherence, still there are perceived barriers to it. In order to increase utilization of face masks among the general population, strict health policies should be implemented and awareness regarding the importance of face masks should be enhanced by educational interventions.

Citing Articles

Public perception on face mask wearing during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia: A cross sectional study.

Yusof M, Fadzil N, Kamaruzi N, Ayazi M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0303031.

PMID: 39190710 PMC: 11349217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303031.

References
1.
Kumar J, Katto M, Siddiqui A, Sahito B, Jamil M, Rasheed N . Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Healthcare Workers Regarding the Use of Face Mask to Limit the Spread of the New Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Cureus. 2020; 12(4):e7737. PMC: 7241223. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7737. View

2.
Wolf M, Serper M, Opsasnick L, OConor R, Curtis L, Yoshino Benavente J . Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak: A Cross-sectional Survey. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 173(2):100-109. PMC: 7151355. DOI: 10.7326/M20-1239. View

3.
Saqlain M, Ahmed A, Nabi I, Gulzar A, Naz S, Munir M . Public Knowledge and Practices Regarding Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Cross-Sectional Survey From Pakistan. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:629015. PMC: 8133216. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.629015. View

4.
Teasdale E, Santer M, Geraghty A, Little P, Yardley L . Public perceptions of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of respiratory infection: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:589. PMC: 4063987. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-589. View

5.
Budhwani H, De P . Disparities in influenza vaccination across the United States: Variability by minority group, Asian sub-populations, socio-economic status, and health insurance coverage. Public Health. 2016; 138:146-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.04.003. View