» Articles » PMID: 35586009

Gender Differences for the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Workplace Violence Among Healthcare Professionals in Shandong, China

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 May 19
PMID 35586009
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Workplace violence (WPV) against healthcare professionals (HPs) has been recognized as important occupational health and societal problem in the world. Many studies were also conducted to explore the prevalence, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of WPV against HPs. Although the gender differences in the prevalence and risk factors of WPV against HPs have been implied in many studies, fewer studies were conducted to explore the gender differences for WPV against HPs, especially in China. In this study, we aim to analyze the gender differences in the prevalence and risk factors of WPV against HPs in Shandong, China.

Methods: This study was conducted among HPs with a cross-sectional design. WPV, social-demographic variables, occupational characteristics, physical disease, social support, and depression were evaluated for the participated HPs. The prevalence and risk factors of WPV among male healthcare professionals (MHPs) and female healthcare professionals (FHPs) were analyzed in this study. Student's -tests, one-way ANOVA, and logistic regressions were performed to test the associated factors of WPV among MHPs and FHPs.

Results: The prevalence of WPV among MHPs and FHPs was 61.4 and 48.8%, respectively. Being silent was the most common method of response to WPV among MHPs (52.3%) and FHPs (59.2%). For MHPs, the associated factors of WPV were master's degree (odds ratio (OR) =2.20, < 0.05), bachelor's degree (OR = 2.49, < 0.001), lower income level (OR = 1.81, < 0.05), manager (OR = 1.81, < 0.05), and depression (OR = 1.05, < 0.001). For FHPs, the associated factors of WPV were a master's degree (OR = 1.58, < 0.05), more working hours per week (OR = 1.02, < 0.001), and depression (OR = 1.05, < 0.001).

Conclusion: The prevalence of WPV among MHPs was higher than FHPs, and the associated factors for WPV against HPs were also different among MHPs and FHPs. The findings remind us that some gender-specific interventions are needed to control WPV against HPs.

Citing Articles

A gender-based review of workplace violence amongst the global health workforce-A scoping review of the literature.

Nelson S, Ayaz B, Baumann A, Dozois G PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0003336.

PMID: 38954697 PMC: 11218983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003336.


A systematic review of workplace triggers of emotions in the healthcare environment, the emotions experienced, and the impact on patient safety.

Sattar R, Lawton R, Janes G, Elshehaly M, Heyhoe J, Hague I BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):603.

PMID: 38720302 PMC: 11080227. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11011-1.


Violence against physicians working in public tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh: a facility-based cross-sectional study.

Hasan M, Sarkar T, Ahmed M, Banik A, Islam S, Zaman M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e080244.

PMID: 38471678 PMC: 10936528. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080244.


Workplace violence against Chinese licensed doctors: a cross-sectional study.

Chen W, Shi J, Xu J, Wang Y, Wu Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1235576.

PMID: 38356951 PMC: 10864590. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1235576.


Workplace violence against COVID-19 front-line healthcare workers versus non-front-line in Hangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.

Jiang D, Wang Q, Xiao X, Zhang J, Xie Y, Zhu Y BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e073226.

PMID: 37775296 PMC: 10546115. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073226.


References
1.
Zhu H, Liu X, Yao L, Zhou L, Qin J, Zhu C . Workplace violence in primary hospitals and associated risk factors: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2021; 9(1):513-518. PMC: 8685843. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1090. View

2.
Fisekovic M, Trajkovic G, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V, Terzic-Supic Z . Does workplace violence exist in primary health care? Evidence from Serbia. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(4):693-8. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku247. View

3.
Islami Vaghar M, Masrour M . A comparative study of satisfaction and family conflicts among married nurses with different working hours. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019; 8(2):472-476. PMC: 6436245. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_395_18. View

4.
Li M, Liu J, Zheng J, Liu K, Wang J, Ross A . The relationship of workplace violence and nurse outcomes: Gender difference study on a propensity score matched sample. J Adv Nurs. 2019; 76(2):600-610. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14268. View

5.
Gimenez Lozano J, Martinez Ramon J, Rodriguez F . Doctors and Nurses: A Systematic Review of the Risk and Protective Factors in Workplace Violence and Burnout. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6). PMC: 8004742. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063280. View