» Articles » PMID: 35582013

Natural Products As a Means of Overcoming Cisplatin Chemoresistance in Bladder Cancer

Overview
Date 2022 May 18
PMID 35582013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cisplatin remains an integral part of the treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. A large number of patients do not respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and efficacious salvage regimens are limited. Immunotherapy has offered a second line of treatment; however, only approximately 20% of patients respond, and molecular subtyping of tumors indicates there may be significant overlap in those patients that respond to cisplatin and those patients that respond to immunotherapy. As such, restoring sensitivity to cisplatin remains a major hurdle to improving patient care. One potential source of compounds for enhancing cisplatin is naturally derived bioactive products such as phytochemicals, flavonoids and others. These compounds can activate a diverse array of different pathways, many of which can directly promote or inhibit cisplatin sensitivity. The purpose of this review is to understand current drug development in the area of natural products and to assess how these compounds may enhance cisplatin treatment in bladder cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Nanocurcumin preserves kidney function and haematology parameters in DMBA-induced ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin via its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effect in rats.

Louisa M, Wanafri E, Arozal W, Sandhiutami N, Basalamah A Pharm Biol. 2023; 61(1):298-305.

PMID: 36708211 PMC: 9888479. DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2023.2166965.


Upregulation of the Long Noncoding RNA CASC10 Promotes Cisplatin Resistance in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Noriega-Rivera R, Rivera-Serrano M, Rabelo-Fernandez R, Perez-Santiago J, Valiyeva F, Vivas-Mejia P Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(14).

PMID: 35887085 PMC: 9318856. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147737.


Natural bioactive compounds: a potential therapeutic strategy to sensitize bladder cancer to cisplatin treatment?.

Ruiz de Porras V Cancer Drug Resist. 2022; 5(2):339-343.

PMID: 35800376 PMC: 9255239. DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2022.02.


Battling Chemoresistance in Cancer: Root Causes and Strategies to Uproot Them.

Ramos A, Sadeghi S, Tabatabaeian H Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(17).

PMID: 34502361 PMC: 8430957. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179451.

References
1.
McConkey D, Choi W, Shen Y, Lee I, Porten S, Matin S . A Prognostic Gene Expression Signature in the Molecular Classification of Chemotherapy-naïve Urothelial Cancer is Predictive of Clinical Outcomes from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Phase 2 Trial of Dose-dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin,.... Eur Urol. 2015; 69(5):855-62. PMC: 4775435. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.034. View

2.
Woods D, Turchi J . Chemotherapy induced DNA damage response: convergence of drugs and pathways. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013; 14(5):379-89. PMC: 3672181. DOI: 10.4161/cbt.23761. View

3.
Hedegaard J, Lamy P, Nordentoft I, Algaba F, Hoyer S, Ulhoi B . Comprehensive Transcriptional Analysis of Early-Stage Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016; 30(1):27-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.004. View

4.
Galsky M, Wang H, Hahn N, Twardowski P, Pal S, Albany C . Phase 2 Trial of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer and Impact of DNA Damage Response Gene Mutations on Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2017; 73(5):751-759. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.001. View

5.
Li Y, Lin K, Yang Z, Han N, Quan X, Guo X . Bladder cancer stem cells: clonal origin and therapeutic perspectives. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(39):66668-66679. PMC: 5630446. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19112. View