» Articles » PMID: 35577866

A Typology of North Sea Oil and Gas Platforms

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 May 16
PMID 35577866
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the commercial exploitation of marine oil and gas reserves began in the middle of the twentieth century, extensive networks of offshore infrastructure have been installed globally. Many of the structures are now nearing the end of their operational lives and will soon require decommissioning, generating renewed interest in their environmental impacts and in the ecological consequences of their removal. However, such work requires selection of a subsample of assets for surveying; censuses of the entire 'population' in any given jurisdiction are practically impossible due to their sheer number. It is important, therefore, that the selected sample is sufficiently representative of the population to draw generalized conclusions. Here, a formal clustering methodology, partitioning around medoids, was used to produce a typology of surface-piercing oil and gas platforms in the North Sea. The variables used for clustering were hydrocarbon product, operational state, platform design and material, and substructure weight. Assessing intra-cluster variability identified 13 clusters as the optimum number. The most important distinguishing variable was platform type, isolating floating platforms first, then concrete gravity-based and then fixed steel. Following clustering, a geographic trend was evident, with oil production more prevalent in the north and gas in the south. The typology allows a representative subset of North Sea oil and gas platforms to be selected when designing a survey, or an assessment of the representativeness of a previously selected subset of platforms. This will facilitate the efficient use of the limited funding available for such studies.

Citing Articles

Elevated fish densities extend kilometres from oil and gas platforms.

Lawrence J, Speirs D, Heath M, Fujii T, Burns F, Fernandes P PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302738.

PMID: 38709717 PMC: 11073688. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302738.

References
1.
Ekins P, Vanner R, Firebrace J . Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: a comparative assessment of different scenarios. J Environ Manage. 2005; 79(4):420-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.023. View

2.
Connell S . Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs. Mar Environ Res. 2001; 52(2):115-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0141-1136(00)00266-x. View

3.
Claisse J, Pondella 2nd D, Love M, Zahn L, Williams C, Williams J . Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(43):15462-7. PMC: 4217422. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411477111. View

4.
Petersen J, Maim T . Offshore windmill farms: threats to or possibilities for the marine environment. Ambio. 2006; 35(2):75-80. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[75:owftto]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Paxton A, Newton E, Adler A, Van Hoeck R, Iversen Jr E, Taylor J . Artificial habitats host elevated densities of large reef-associated predators. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0237374. PMC: 7467309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237374. View