» Articles » PMID: 35575237

Clinical and Quality of Life Assessment in Patients with Latex Allergy During COVID-19 Pandemic: Possible Protective Role of Continuous Latex Immunotherapy

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During COVID-19 pandemic, the massive use of Personal Protective Equipment could provoke severe adverse reactions in latex allergy patients and could negatively affect their quality of life. Trough a survey the study aimed: (a) to evaluate the incidence of allergic reactions in patients with latex allergy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic; (b) to evaluate the protective role of continuous latex sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during this period; and (c) to evaluate quality of life of natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) patients during the pandemic. 67 patients (9 males and 58 females, mean age of 45.9 ± 11.4 years) suffering from latex allergy were included in the present study. We recorded among our patients 13 cases (34.2%) of urticarial/angioedema (U/A), 9 cases (23.6%) of respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, shortness of breath and wheezing) and 7 cases (18.4%) of anaphylaxis. In patients who underwent continuous SLIT, we observed less cases of U/A ( < 0.001), respiratory symptoms ( < 0.001), anaphylaxis ( = 0.003), hospitalizations ( = 0.014) and a lower therapy administration. We compared the results of SF-36 questionnaire in patients who underwent continuous and not-continuous SLIT with a significance differences score between these two groups. Our study is the first that investigated the clinical and quality of life effects of COVID-19 pandemic in NRLA patients.

Citing Articles

Latex Allergy in Children.

Arasi S, Barni S, Caminiti L, Castagnoli R, Giovannini M, Liotti L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202131 PMC: 10779698. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010124.

References
1.
Wrangsjo K, Boman A, Liden C, Meding B . Primary prevention of latex allergy in healthcare-spectrum of strategies including the European glove standardization. Contact Dermatitis. 2012; 66(4):165-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02057.x. View

2.
Bedolla-Barajas M, Machuca-Rincon M, Morales-Romero J, Macriz-Romero N, Madrigal-Beas I, Robles-Figueroa M . [Self-reported prevalence of latex allergy and associated factors in healthcare workers]. Rev Alerg Mex. 2017; 64(4):430-438. DOI: 10.29262/ram.v64i4.289. View

3.
Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M . Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives. J Asthma Allergy. 2020; 13:385-398. PMC: 7532063. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. View

4.
Brazier J, Harper R, Jones N, OCathain A, Thomas K, Usherwood T . Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992; 305(6846):160-4. PMC: 1883187. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. View

5.
Nucera E, Schiavino D, Sabato V, Colagiovanni A, Pecora V, Rizzi A . Sublingual immunotherapy for latex allergy: tolerability and safety profile of rush build-up phase. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24(4):1147-54. DOI: 10.1185/030079908x291903. View