» Articles » PMID: 35572693

Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 May 16
PMID 35572693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Climate change is expanding drylands even as land use practices degrade them. Representing ∼40% of Earth's terrestrial surface, drylands rely on biological soil crusts (biocrusts) for key ecosystem functions including soil stability, biogeochemical cycling, and water capture. Understanding how biocrusts adapt to climate change is critical to understanding how dryland ecosystems will function with altered climate. We investigated the sensitivity of biocrusts to experimentally imposed novel climates to track changes in productivity and stability under both warming and cooling scenarios. We established three common gardens along an elevational-climate gradient on the Colorado Plateau. Mature biocrusts were collected from each site and reciprocally transplanted intact. Over 20 months we monitored visible species composition and cover, chlorophyll a, and the composition of soil bacterial communities using high throughput sequencing. We hypothesized that biocrusts replanted at their home site would show local preference, and biocrusts transplanted to novel environments would maintain higher cover and stability at elevations higher than their origin, compared to at elevations lower than their origin. We expected responses of the visible biocrust cover and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community to be coupled, with later successional taxa showing higher sensitivity to novel environments. Only high elevation sourced biocrusts maintained higher biocrust cover and community stability at their site of origin. Biocrusts from all sources had higher cover and stability in the high elevation garden. Later successional taxa decreased cover in low elevation gardens, suggesting successional reversal with warming. Visible community composition was influenced by both source and transplant environment. In contrast, soil bacterial community composition was not influenced by transplant environments but retained fidelity to the source. Thus, responses of the visible and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community were not coupled. Synthesis: Our results suggest biocrust communities are sensitive to climate change, and loss of species and function can be expected, while associated soil bacteria may be buffered against rapid change.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Soil Health Through Biocrusts: A Microbial Ecosystem Approach for Degradation Control and Restoration.

Gufwan L, Peng L, Gufwan N, Lan S, Wu L Microb Ecol. 2025; 88(1):8.

PMID: 39985718 PMC: 11846762. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-025-02504-5.


Environmental gradients shape genetic variation in the desert moss, Syntrichia caninervis Mitt. (Pottiaceae).

Farah U, Fisher K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2064.

PMID: 39814916 PMC: 11735628. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86305-3.


Proposed Relationships Between Climate, Biological Soil Crusts, Human Health, and in Arid Ecosystems.

Ramsey M, Kollath D, Antoninka A, Barker B Geohealth. 2025; 9(1):e2024GH001217.

PMID: 39802983 PMC: 11724335. DOI: 10.1029/2024GH001217.


Cultivating Resilience in Dryland Soils: An Assisted Migration Approach to Biological Soil Crust Restoration.

Jech S, Day N, Barger N, Antoninka A, Bowker M, Reed S Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894228 PMC: 10608944. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102570.

References
1.
Reynolds J, Smith D, Lambin E, Turner 2nd B, Mortimore M, Batterbury S . Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science. 2007; 316(5826):847-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.1131634. View

2.
Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View

3.
Fierer N, Jackson R . The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(3):626-31. PMC: 1334650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103. View

4.
Yeager C, Kornosky J, Housman D, Grote E, Belnap J, Kuske C . Diazotrophic community structure and function in two successional stages of biological soil crusts from the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(2):973-83. PMC: 348917. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.973-983.2004. View

5.
Eldridge D, Reed S, Travers S, Bowker M, Maestre F, Ding J . The pervasive and multifaceted influence of biocrusts on water in the world's drylands. Glob Chang Biol. 2020; 26(10):6003-6014. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15232. View