» Articles » PMID: 35571534

Defect Etching in Carbon Nanotube Walls for Porous Carbon Nanoreactors: Implications for CO Sorption and the Hydrosilylation of Phenylacetylene

Overview
Date 2022 May 16
PMID 35571534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A method of pore fabrication in the walls of carbon nanotubes has been developed, leading to porous nanotubes that have been filled with catalysts and utilized in liquid- and gas-phase reactions. Chromium oxide nanoparticles have been utilized as highly effective etchants of carbon nanotube sidewalls. Tuning the thermal profile and loading of this nanoscale oxidant, both of which influence the localized oxidation of the carbon, have allowed the controlled formation of defects and holes with openings of 40-60 nm, penetrating through several layers of the graphitic carbon nanotube sidewall, resulting in templated nanopore propagation. The porous carbon nanotubes have been demonstrated as catalytic nanoreactors, effectively stabilizing catalytic nanoparticles against agglomeration and modulating the reaction environment around active centers. CO sorption on ruthenium nanoparticles (RuNPs) inside nanoreactors led to distinctive surface-bound intermediates (such as carbonate species), compared to RuNPs on amorphous carbon. Introducing pores in nanoreactors modulates the strength of absorption of these intermediates, as they bond more strongly on RuNPs in porous nanoreactors as compared to the nanoreactors without pores. In the liquid-phase hydrosilylation of phenylacetylene, the confinement of Rh(CO) catalyst centers within the porous nanoreactors changes the distribution of the products relative to those observed in the absence of the additional pores. These changes have been attributed to the enhanced local concentration of phenylacetylene and the environment in which the catalytic centers reside within the porous carbon host.

Citing Articles

Transformation of Tin Microparticles to Nanoparticles on Nanotextured Carbon Support Boosts the Efficiency of the Electrochemical CO Reduction.

Burwell T, Thangamuthu M, Besley E, Chen Y, Pyer J, Alves Fernandes J ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2025; 8(4):2281-2290.

PMID: 40018389 PMC: 11863182. DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.4c02830.

References
1.
Khlobystov A . Carbon nanotubes: from nano test tube to nano-reactor. ACS Nano. 2011; 5(12):9306-12. DOI: 10.1021/nn204596p. View

2.
Castillejos E, Debouttiere P, Roiban L, Solhy A, Martinez V, Kihn Y . An efficient strategy to drive nanoparticles into carbon nanotubes and the remarkable effect of confinement on their catalytic performance. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009; 48(14):2529-33. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200805273. View

3.
Lebedeva M, Chamberlain T, Thomas A, Thomas B, Stoppiello C, Volkova E . Chemical reactions at the graphitic step-edge: changes in product distribution of catalytic reactions as a tool to explore the environment within carbon nanoreactors. Nanoscale. 2016; 8(22):11727-37. DOI: 10.1039/c6nr03360a. View

4.
Shao L, Tobias G, Salzmann C, Ballesteros B, Hong S, Crossley A . Removal of amorphous carbon for the efficient sidewall functionalisation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun (Camb). 2007; (47):5090-2. DOI: 10.1039/b712614j. View

5.
Agasti N, Astle M, Rance G, Alves Fernandes J, Dupont J, Khlobystov A . Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Inside Carbon Nanoreactors for Selective Allylic Oxidation of Cyclohexene. Nano Lett. 2020; 20(2):1161-1171. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04579. View