» Articles » PMID: 355712

[Cytostatica and Small Intestine (author's Transl)]

Overview
Journal Klin Wochenschr
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1978 Jun 15
PMID 355712
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytostatica not only suppress proliferation in tumor cells but it also checks proliferation in small intestinal epithelium. The consequence is cell reduction and damage resulting in a diminished function. Because of the high reserve capacity of the small intestinal epithelium, clinical signs of diminished function are mostly seen after repeated high doses or one extremely high doses of Cytostatica. Although there is abundant information on the effect of Cytostatica on the small intestinal epithelium (cell turnover, morphology, digestive enzymes and absorption) there are other areas that are as urgent for the interested clinician to work on: 1. Would it be possible to coincide the dose and dosage rate with the cell cycles to reduce the chance of damage to small intestinal epithelium? 2. Which role has the luminal content when there is damage from Cytostatica? Is it possible to concentrate on changing the luminal contents (antibiotics, "elemental diet", cultivate desirable microflora, etc.) Therefore diminishing the damage from Cytostatica? 3. How would Cytostatica influence the barrier function on the intestinal wall? Should the patient on Cytostatica therapy receive special protection against intestinal infection? 4. Does Cytostatica affect the biotransformation in the small intestinal epithelium, especially when taken orally? How important is this biotransformation in small intestinal epithelium damaged by Cytostatica therapy? 5. What factors determine the regeneration of the small intestinal epithelium after Cytostatica damage?

Citing Articles

Effect of a single high dose and repeated small doses of dianhydrogalactitol (DAG; NSC-132313) on rat intestinal mucosa.

Kralovanszky J, Prajda N, Kerpel-Fronius S, GAL F, Szentirmay Z Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1983; 11(3):167-71.

PMID: 6416695 DOI: 10.1007/BF00254198.


The pharmacokinetics of melphalan during intermittent therapy of multiple myeloma.

Loos U, Musch E, Engel M, Hartlapp J, Hugl E, DENGLER H Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 35(2):187-93.

PMID: 3191937 DOI: 10.1007/BF00609251.


Growth and transformation of the small intestinal mucosa--importance of connective tissue, gut associated lymphoid tissue and gastrointestinal regulatory peptides.

Riecken E, Stallmach A, Zeitz M, Schulzke J, MENGE H, Gregor M Gut. 1989; 30(11):1630-40.

PMID: 2689302 PMC: 1434331. DOI: 10.1136/gut.30.11.1630.

References
1.
Lieberman M, Verbin R, Landay M, Liang H, Farber E, Lee T . A probable role for protein synthesis in intestinal epithelial cell damage induced in vivo by cytosine arabinoside, nitrogen mustard, or X-irradiation. Cancer Res. 1970; 30(4):942-51. View

2.
Trier J . Morphologic alterations induced by methotrexate in the mucosa of human proximal intestine. I. Serial observations by light microscopy. Gastroenterology. 1962; 42:295-305. View

3.
Ben-Ishay Z, Farber E . Protective effects of an inhibitor of protein synthesis, cycloheximide, on bone marrow damage induced by cytosine arabinoside or nitrogen mustard. Lab Invest. 1975; 33(5):278-90. View

4.
WURTH M, MUSACCHIA X . Mechlorethamine effects on intestinal absorption in vitro and on cell proliferation. Am J Physiol. 1973; 225(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1973.225.1.73. View

5.
PHILLIPS F, Sternberg S . The lethal actions of antitumor agents in proliferating cell systems in vivo. Am J Pathol. 1975; 81(1):205-18. PMC: 2032299. View