COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Italy: Predictors of Acceptance, Fence Sitting and Refusal of the COVID-19 Vaccination
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The hesitancy in taking the COVID-19 vaccine is a global challenge. The need to identify predictors of COVID-19 vaccine reluctance is critical. Our objectives were to evaluate sociodemographic, psychological, and behavioral factors, as well as attitudes and beliefs that influence COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in the general population of Italy.
Methods: A total of 2,015 people were assessed in two waves (March, April and May, 2021). Participants were divided into three groups: (1) individuals who accepted the vaccination ("accepters"); (2) individuals who refused the vaccination ("rejecters"); and (3) individuals who were uncertain about their attitudes toward the vaccination ("fence sitters"). Group comparisons were performed using ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square tests. The strength of the association between the groups and the participants' characteristics was analyzed using a series of multinomial logistic regression models with bootstrap internal validation (one for each factor).
Results: The "fence sitters" group, when compared to the others, included individuals of younger age, lower educational level, and worsening economic situation in the previous 3 months. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, the following features emerged as the main risk factors for being "fence sitters" (compared with vaccine "accepters"): reporting lower levels of protective behaviors, trust in institutions and informational sources, frequency of use of informational sources, agreement with restrictions and higher conspirative mentality. Higher levels of COVID-19 perceived risk, trust in institutions and informational sources, frequency of use of informational sources, agreement with restrictions and protective behaviors were associated with a higher likelihood of becoming "fence sitters" rather than vaccine "rejecters."
Conclusions: The "fence sitters" profile revealed by this study is intriguing and should be the focus of public programmes aimed at improving adherence to the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
Adorni F, Cavigli C, Jesuthasan N, Cori L, Sojic A, Bianchi F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).
PMID: 40003539 PMC: 11855322. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020314.
Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review.
De Araujo J, Delpino F, Andrade-Goncalves R, Aragao F, Ferezin L, Santos D Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.
PMID: 39772014 PMC: 11680215. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121352.
Taubert F, Meyer-Hoeven G, Schmid P, Gerdes P, Betsch C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3325.
PMID: 39609773 PMC: 11606073. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y.
Darbandi A, Koupaei M, Kiani P, Ghanavati R, Najafi P, Hosseini J Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024; 12(11):e70076.
PMID: 39570098 PMC: 11580281. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.70076.
The Motivation for COVID-19 Vaccination and Preventive Behavior.
Hong J, Wu T, Tsai W J Prev (2022). 2024; 45(5):765-783.
PMID: 38839737 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-024-00787-x.