» Articles » PMID: 35569764

Mechanical Property Comparison of 23-, 25-, and 27-Gauge Vitrectors Across Vitrectomy Systems

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 May 15
PMID 35569764
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the mechanical properties of 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge vitrectomy vitrectors across 3 different vitrectomy systems to inform surgical techniques.

Design: An experimental study that did not involve any human subjects.

Methods: Nine vitrectors (3 each of 23-, 25-, and 27 gauge) from Alcon, Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center (DORC), and Bausch & Lomb (B/L) were measured. Measurements were performed using electroforce displacement at the tip and 15 mm from the tip. Five measurements were performed at each location, and fully elastic deformation was ensured.

Main Outcome Measures: The main parameter being measured was the force in grams (gf) necessary to deflect the vitrectors vertically downward by 1 mm, either at the tip of the vitrector or 15 mm from the tip.

Results: A total of 90 measurements were performed. Across brands, B/L demonstrated the least stiffness at both the tip and at the 15-mm point for 23-gauge (8.0±0.3gf, 67.3±1.0gf), 25-gauge (6.8±0.3gf, 60.5±0.4gf), and 27-gauge (3.3±0.1gf, 33.9±0.5gf) vitrectors. Although there was only a small decrease in the stiffness in the 25-gauge vitrector compared with the 23-gauge vitrector at the 15-mm point, this difference was statistically significant for Alcon (P < 0.001), DORC (P < 0.001), and B/L (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Based on this study, 25-gauge vitrectors, although larger than the 27-gauge vitrectors and less stiff than the 23-gauge vitrectors, may offer favorable compromise between stiffness and gauge size. However, surgeon experience, preference, and the type of surgery being performed should be paramount when making the final vitrector selection. Knowledge of these mechanical properties may aid surgeons in choosing between gauge size and vitrectomy system to optimize their comfort and efficiency.

Citing Articles

Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy: a consecutive, single-centre case series with exclusive use over a 4-year period.

Ng E, Masalkhi M, Steel D, Pavicic-Astalos J, Nolan C, Mernagh S BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):518.

PMID: 38129776 PMC: 10734045. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03265-w.


A sutureless technique for securing leaking sclerotomies with viscoelastic substances in 23-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery.

Li M, Yi Q, Mao J, Liao Y, Wang Y, Lu Q Int J Ophthalmol. 2023; 16(5):730-735.

PMID: 37206171 PMC: 10172098. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.05.09.

References
1.
Warrier S, Jain R, Gilhotra J, Newland H . Sutureless vitrectomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008; 56(6):453-8. PMC: 2612983. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.43364. View

2.
Appenzeller M, Petersen M, Foster R, Miller D, Riemann C . Intraoperative mechanical failure of a 25-gauge vitreous cutter. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2014; 4(3):274-5. DOI: 10.1097/ICB.0b013e3181a59dd1. View

3.
Woo S, Park K, Hwang J, Kim J, Yu Y, Chung H . Risk factors associated with sclerotomy leakage and postoperative hypotony after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2009; 29(4):456-63. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318195cb28. View

4.
Stalmans P . A Comparative Study of 23-Gauge and 27-Gauge Vitrectomy for Puckers or Floaters, Including Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Phaco-Vitrectomy Surgery on Postoperative Outcome. Ophthalmologica. 2021; 244(3):245-249. PMC: 8315687. DOI: 10.1159/000515118. View

5.
Oliveira P, Berger A, Chow D . Vitreoretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endoillumination and wide-angle viewing systems. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016; 2:28. PMC: 5137208. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-016-0052-9. View