» Articles » PMID: 35569282

Convolutional Neural Network Assistance Significantly Improves Dermatologists' Diagnosis of Cutaneous Tumours Using Clinical Images

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 May 15
PMID 35569282
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated expert-level performance in cutaneous tumour classification using clinical images, but most previous studies have focused on dermatologist-versus-CNN comparisons rather than their combination. The objective of our study was to evaluate the potential impact of CNN assistance on dermatologists for clinical image interpretation.

Methods: A multi-class CNN was trained and validated using a dataset of 25,773 clinical images comprising 10 categories of cutaneous tumours. The CNN's performance was tested on an independent dataset of 2107 images. A total of 400 images (40 per category) were randomly selected from the test dataset. A fully crossed, self-control, multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study was conducted to compare the performance of 18 board-certified dermatologists (experience: 13/18 ≤ 10 years; 5/18>10 years) in interpreting the 400 clinical images with or without CNN assistance.

Results: The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 78.45% and kappa of 0.73 in the classification of 10 types of cutaneous tumours on 2107 images. CNN-assisted dermatologists achieved a higher accuracy (76.60% vs. 62.78%, P < 0.001) and kappa (0.74 vs. 0.59, P < 0.001) than unassisted dermatologists in interpreting the 400 clinical images. Dermatologists with less experience benefited more from CNN assistance. At the binary classification level (malignant or benign), the sensitivity (89.56% vs. 83.21%, P < 0.001) and specificity (87.90% vs. 80.92%, P < 0.001) of dermatologists with CNN assistance were also significantly improved than those without.

Conclusions: CNN assistance improved dermatologist accuracy in interpreting cutaneous tumours and could further boost the acceptance of this new technique.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive infrared thermography for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of skin cancer.

Kesztyus D, Bae H, Wilson C, Schon M, Kesztyus T J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024; 23(1):7-17.

PMID: 39632452 PMC: 11711949. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15598.


Identification of middle cerebral artery stenosis in transcranial Doppler using a modified VGG-16.

Xu D, Li H, Su F, Qiu S, Tong H, Huang M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1394435.

PMID: 39479004 PMC: 11521853. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394435.


Deep Learning Techniques for the Dermoscopic Differential Diagnosis of Benign/Malignant Melanocytic Skin Lesions: From the Past to the Present.

Tognetti L, Miracapillo C, Leonardelli S, Luschi A, Iadanza E, Cevenini G Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199716 PMC: 11351129. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080758.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis.

Salinas M, Sepulveda J, Hidalgo L, Peirano D, Morel M, Uribe P NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):125.

PMID: 38744955 PMC: 11094047. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01103-x.


Human-AI interaction in skin cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Krakowski I, Kim J, Cai Z, Daneshjou R, Lapins J, Eriksson H NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):78.

PMID: 38594408 PMC: 11004168. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01031-w.