» Articles » PMID: 35566571

Clinical Differences and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-Related Factors of Lean and Non-Lean Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

Abstract

This study investigated differences in the clinical data and prevalence of lean and non-lean patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Data on patients with MetS who had results of ultrasonography or transient elastography were collected from a Thai university hospital database. Patients with exclusion criteria for NAFLD diagnosis were excluded. Patients' clinical characteristic and the performances of three non-invasive scoring systems (fatty liver index [FLI], fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] index, and NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS]) were evaluated. The 743 subjects were classified into two groups: lean MetS (131 patients) and non-lean MetS (612 patients). The NAFLD prevalence in the non-lean group (62.6%) was higher than that in the lean group (31.3%). The age-adjusted odds ratio was 3.43. Advanced fibrosis was detected in 7.6% of lean patients and 10.8% of non-lean patients. FLI was not sensitive enough to detect NAFLD in the lean group at a high cutoff, but it performed acceptably at a low cutoff. FIB-4 performed better than NFS in determining advanced fibrosis. NAFLD was more common in non-lean than lean patients. Lean patients with MetS had a relatively higher risk of NAFLD than the general population. FLI and FIB-4 index performed acceptably in both groups.

Citing Articles

Analyzing and evaluating the prevalence and metabolic profile of lean NAFLD compared to obese NAFLD: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Fatima H, Rangwala H, Mustafa M, Shafique M, Abbas S, Rangwala B Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 15:20420188241274310.

PMID: 39234426 PMC: 11372778. DOI: 10.1177/20420188241274310.


Update in lean metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Sato-Espinoza K, Chotiprasidhi P, Huaman M, Diaz-Ferrer J World J Hepatol. 2024; 16(3):452-464.

PMID: 38577539 PMC: 10989317. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i3.452.

References
1.
Dumitrascu D, Neuman M . Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an update on diagnosis. Clujul Med. 2018; 91(2):147-150. PMC: 5958978. DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-993. View

2.
Puri P, Sanyal A . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Definitions, risk factors, and workup. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2019; 1(4):99-103. PMC: 6499283. DOI: 10.1002/cld.81. View

3.
Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Ballestri S, Fairweather D, Win S, Than T . Sex Differences in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: State of the Art and Identification of Research Gaps. Hepatology. 2019; 70(4):1457-1469. PMC: 6766425. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30626. View

4.
Masarone M, Rosato V, Aglitti A, Bucci T, Caruso R, Salvatore T . Liver biopsy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Steatohepatitis represents the sole feature of liver damage. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178473. PMC: 5453539. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178473. View

5.
Sookoian S, Pirola C . Systematic review with meta-analysis: the significance of histological disease severity in lean patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 47(1):16-25. DOI: 10.1111/apt.14401. View