» Articles » PMID: 35565110

Assessment of Acceptability and Initial Effectiveness of a Unified Protocol Prevention Program to Train Emotional Regulation Skills in Female Nursing Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35565110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Healthcare professionals, especially women, have shown increases in anxious-depressive symptoms as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a Unified Protocol (UP) prevention program to provide emotional regulation skills to cope with stressful situations. The sample consisted of 27 nursing professionals (100% women; mean age: 45.67; SD = 7.71) working in a Spanish public hospital during COVID-19, who were randomized to an immediate treatment group (ITG, = 13) or to a delayed treatment group (DTG, = 14, which served as the waiting list control group and received the program 5 weeks after the ITG had received it). The program consisted of five-weekly, two-hour, UP-based group sessions. Variables related to emotional symptomatology, emotional regulation, personality, burnout, and perceived quality of life were evaluated at the following time points: pre- and post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistically significant between-group differences showed lower emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment in favor of the ITG after the intervention. Regarding the effect over time for all participants who received the UP ( = 27), statistically significant reductions were observed in neuroticism, personal accomplishment, and subjective distress caused by traumatic events (-0.23 ≤ ≤ -0.73). A statistically significant interaction "Time*Condition" was found in anxiety, with increases in the DTG. Participants showed high satisfaction with the UP. These findings show good acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the UP to reduce the emotional impact of the pandemic in female nursing workers.

Citing Articles

From Anxiety to Hardiness: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Spanish CCU Nurses in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Gil-Almagro F, Garcia-Hedrera F, Carmona-Monge F, Penacoba-Puente C Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(2).

PMID: 38399503 PMC: 10890432. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020215.


Protective and risk factors associated with substance use coping among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bryant V, Sorna M, Dana A, Leon K, Guastello A, Sambuco N Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1228517.

PMID: 38173849 PMC: 10761529. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228517.


Resilience, Coping, and the Covid-19 Pandemic Across the Globe - an Update: What Have we Learned?.

Polizzi C, McDonald C, Sleight F, Jay Lynn S Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023; 20(4):316-326.

PMID: 37791081 PMC: 10544248. DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230411.


Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Mediavilla R, Felez-Nobrega M, McGreevy K, Monistrol-Mula A, Bravo-Ortiz M, Bayon C BMJ Ment Health. 2023; 26(1).

PMID: 37263708 PMC: 10254812. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300697.


Individual-level interventions for reducing occupational stress in healthcare workers.

Tamminga S, Emal L, Boschman J, Levasseur A, Thota A, Ruotsalainen J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 5:CD002892.

PMID: 37169364 PMC: 10175042. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6.


References
1.
Vindegaard N, Benros M . COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 89:531-542. PMC: 7260522. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048. View

2.
DEttorre G, Ceccarelli G, Santinelli L, Vassalini P, Innocenti G, Alessandri F . Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Healthcare Workers Dealing with the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(2). PMC: 7828167. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020601. View

3.
Carlucci L, Saggino A, Balsamo M . On the efficacy of the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021; 87:101999. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101999. View

4.
Lovibond P, LOVIBOND S . The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. View

5.
Brown T, Campbell L, Lehman C, Grisham J, Mancill R . Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2001; 110(4):585-99. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.4.585. View