» Articles » PMID: 35564724

Insights into Improving Risk and Safety Communication Through Environmental Health Literacy

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 May 14
PMID 35564724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Messages and materials developed to communicate risk to the public are often misunderstood because the public misperceives risk, science information is too complex, leading to audience misunderstandings, and an overarching focus on the details of the problem without supplying solutions or actions to keep the public safe. This article describes the creation of a communication model to improve risk communication that includes safety information. The authors describe essential components of Risk and Safety Communication based on features of Environmental Health Literacy (EHL), which informed the creation of a protocol for developing risk communication messages and materials. An online training module was developed to aid communicators in creating information to enable the public to protect themselves, their family, and their community, leading to improved comprehension of how the environment impacts health. These principles were developed in a series of focus groups, identifying how the public perceives risk, how they prefer to receive communication, and how participants respond to materials developed using the principles. Important topics discussed are understanding the literacy levels of the target audience, applying that understanding to developing messages, how risk perception leads to misperceptions and how to address those misperceptions by using plain language when developing focused messages and materials.

Citing Articles

Public communication and outreach by mosquito programs in the United States.

Thomas N, Balanay J, Shearman S, Richards S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003804.

PMID: 39700132 PMC: 11658484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003804.


Theoretical and practical aspects of risk communication in food safety: A review study.

Vaseghi Baba F, Esfandiari Z Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e18141.

PMID: 37539121 PMC: 10395359. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18141.


Air Pollution Health Literacy among Active Commuters in Hamilton, Ontario.

Ciarloni R, Newbold K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(13).

PMID: 37444129 PMC: 10341318. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20136282.


Worldwide Surveillance Actions and Initiatives of Drinking Water Quality: A Scoping Review.

Lopes R, Silva C, Silva I, Salvador P, Heller L, Uchoa S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612879 PMC: 9819457. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010559.

References
1.
London J, Haapanen K, Backus A, Mack S, Lindsey M, Andrade K . Aligning Community-Engaged Research to Context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4). PMC: 7068394. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041187. View

2.
Binder A, May K, Murphy J, Gross A, Carlsten E . Environmental Health Literacy as Knowing, Feeling, and Believing: Analyzing Linkages between Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status and Willingness to Engage in Protective Behaviors against Health Threats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5). PMC: 8910584. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052701. View

3.
Koester B, Sloane S, Fujimoto E, Fiese B, Su L . What Do Childcare Providers Know about Environmental Influences on Children's Health? Implications for Environmental Health Literacy Efforts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10). PMC: 8160689. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105489. View

4.
Klein W, Boutte A, Brake H, Beal M, Lyon-Daniel K, Eisenhauer E . Leveraging risk communication science across US federal agencies. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(4):411-413. PMC: 8317163. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01081-0. View

5.
Faour-Klingbeil D, Osaili T, Al-Nabulsi A, Jemni M, Todd E . The public perception of food and non-food related risks of infection and trust in the risk communication during COVID-19 crisis: A study on selected countries from the Arab region. Food Control. 2021; 121:107617. PMC: 7833585. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107617. View