» Articles » PMID: 35562248

Comparison of Tele-Education and Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training During COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Journal J Emerg Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2022 May 13
PMID 35562248
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by lay rescuers can increase a person's chance of survival. The COVID-19 pandemic enforced prevention policies that encouraged social distancing, which disrupted conventional modes of health care education. Tele-education may benefit CPR training during the pandemic.

Objective: Our aim was to compare CPR knowledge and skills using tele-education vs. conventional classroom teaching methods.

Methods: A noninferiority trial was conducted as a Basic Life Support workshop. Participants were randomly assigned to a tele-education or conventional group. Primary outcomes assessed were CPR knowledge and skills and secondary outcomes assessed were individual skills, ventilation, and chest compression characteristics.

Results: Pretraining knowledge scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 3.50 ± 2.18 vs. 4.35 ± 1.70; p = 0.151) and post-training knowledge scores (7.91 ± 2.14 vs. 8.52 ± 0.90; p = 0.502) of the tele-education and conventional groups, respectively, had no statistically significant difference. Both groups' training resulted in a significant and comparable gain in knowledge scores (p < 0.001). The tele-education and conventional groups skill scores (mean ± SD 78.30 ± 6.77 vs. 79.65 ± 9.93; p = 0.579) had no statistical difference. Skillset scores did not differ statistically except for the compression rate and ventilation ratio; the conventional group performed better (p = 0.042 vs. p = 0.017). The tele-education and conventional groups' number of participants passed the skill test (95.5% and 91.3%, respectively; p = 1.000).

Conclusions: Tele-education offers a pragmatic and reasonably effective alternative to conventional CPR training during the COVID-19 pandemic.

References
1.
Weeks D, Molsberry D . Pediatric advanced life support re-training by videoconferencing compared to face-to-face instruction: a planned non-inferiority trial. Resuscitation. 2008; 79(1):109-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.008. View

2.
Ateriya N, Saraf A, Meshram V, Setia P . Telemedicine and virtual consultation: The Indian perspective. Natl Med J India. 2019; 31(4):215-218. DOI: 10.4103/0970-258X.258220. View

3.
Hasselqvist-Ax I, Riva G, Herlitz J, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, Nordberg P . Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(24):2307-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405796. View

4.
Haney M, Silvestri S, Van Dillen C, Ralls G, Cohen E, Papa L . A comparison of tele-education versus conventional lectures in wound care knowledge and skill acquisition. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 18(2):79-81. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110811. View

5.
Sanghavi P, Jena A, Newhouse J, Zaslavsky A . Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by basic vs advanced life support. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 175(2):196-204. PMC: 4314335. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5420. View