» Articles » PMID: 35558997

Effects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

Overview
Journal Clin Nutr Res
Date 2022 May 13
PMID 35558997
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study sought to investigate the effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative recovery and nutritional status in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. A total of 37 patients were included: 19 in the experimental group and 18 in the control group. The experimental group was supplemented with carbohydrate drinks before and after surgery, and the control group was maintained with fasting and water intake in the traditional method. Both care management and nutrition education were implemented for both groups. Patients were evaluated for physical condition, clinical indicators, blood tests, pain, length of stay, nutritional status, and nutrient intake. Use of the ERAS program for the experimental group resulted in shorter length of stay ( = 0.006), less pain ( < 0.001), and a lower rate of malnutrition ( = 0.014) compared with controls. In conclusion, carbohydrate drinks provide great advantages by reducing discomfort, such as pain or thirst, during fasting in patients after colon cancer surgery, helping patients to eat comfortably and actively, minimizing insulin resistance, maintaining nitrogen balance, and reducing infection and anastomosis leakage. For use of ERAS as a standardized program, repeated and expanded research is needed, and a Korean-style ERAS should be prepared by using this approach for various diseases.

Citing Articles

Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Li Z, Ma H, Yang Y, Chen J, Wang Z World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(3):816-822.

PMID: 38577072 PMC: 10989332. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.816.


Thoracic day surgery versus thoracic inpatient surgery for treatment of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shen C, Che G J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023; 18(1):341.

PMID: 38007507 PMC: 10676578. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02462-4.

References
1.
El-Shami K, Oeffinger K, Erb N, Willis A, Bretsch J, Pratt-Chapman M . American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(6):428-55. PMC: 5385892. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21286. View

2.
Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T, Jorgensen M, Gibbs P, Faragher I . Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014; 49(2):258-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006. View

3.
Koller S, Bauer K, Egleston B, Smith R, Philp M, Ross H . Comparative Effectiveness and Risks of Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(4):734-742. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002159. View

4.
Sheikh-Wu S, Anglade D, Gattamorta K, Xiao C, Downs C . Positive psychology mediates the relationship between symptom frequency and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors during acute cancer survivorship. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022; 58:102136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102136. View

5.
Lee Y, Park I, Cho H, Gwak G, Yang K, Bae B . Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Elderly Stage II High-Risk Colorectal Cancer Patients. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(5):298-305. PMC: 8566145. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.00829.0118. View